View Single Post
Old 12.09.2007, 01:50 PM   #63
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,729
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmku
This is so fake. The handwritten comments look like the handwriting of a 6th-grader. And the teacher's remarks are totally un-teacher-like, unless we're talking P.E. or Driver's Ed teacher. "creative flair for writing..." So cliched. And the critiques are not the articulate comments you'd expect from an English teacher, even at the high school level. A true English teacher, if this bothered him or her, would be decidely more snide in his/her commentary to match the student's snide undertaking of a porn review. At least the smart teacher would do so, to show the student that the student is not getting the upper hand. Like the comment above, "A 'touching' analysis but doesn't 'penetrate' the subject." And, "Don't see me. Just do it over, or accept an F."

mang,you forget that engrish departments these days are all staffed by TAs-- not tits and ass but grad students with a license to kill.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|