Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
If any of you have actually read up or taken any interest, its no different to the filters that were previously on offer a few months ago from the government, with the difference its given to you when you sign up
|
The Howard governments plan was voluntary 'opt-in', you don't think people who chose to 'opt-out' of this aren't going to be treated with suspicion? If this is to get Family Firsts senate vote, then what other Pentacostal fixations could banned? Or maybe Rio Tinto can put in a good word about websites critical of their mining operations in West Papua? The sky is the limit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
For kevin07 to roll out his wholeshebang education revolution, I can definatley understand why this along with the new uncapped broadband is one of his first priorities. If hes getting every child to actually use the internet as a medium for their learning on a daily basis, without doing something like this, it would not have been long for someone to take a stab at whether or not he understands how DANGEROUS AND UNSAFE the internet can be for little kiddies. yaknow.
|
This will even further slow our internet, so his plans to increase speeds will likely be just bringing them up to pre-ban days! Schools already have their own filters (I sure remember mine did); as for home, well, you see there are these things called parents and they have these things called responsibilities...