Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
filtering does not stop the use of proxies and tunnels, the filters are put in place for children and idiots.
|
Will these proxies and tunnels also bypass an '18 (or 78!) per cent reduction in relative performance'?
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
do you think no censorship should occur at all across any media?
|
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
also some parents are fucking useless and fucked up so their kids need someone to protect them.
|
Child Protective Services.
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
leave all the left and right wing ideologies at the door and just be rational...
|
You're advocating blanket mandatory all-pervasive censorship with access monitored by a single central authority and you're lecturing other people about rational thought?!
And speaking of right wing ideologies, would that be the right wing ideologies of Family First and the Pentecostal Church that are being appeased by this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal pharmacy
or should it be too easy for children to be able to access kiddy porn, animal porn, be targets of paedo's in chat rooms.
|
Ah, just like Senator Conroy equating defence of freespeech with advocacy of child pornography. However, the ISPs do offer services and parents can buy blocking software and not put the computer in the childs bedroom. Now we're back to that grey area occupied by that mysterious concept some call responsibilities...
As for environment well I was just being sarcastic, takes more than a few days in office before you can say a government has 'done some great things' on any given topic. But if you want to be serious then a good example would be the pretence of signing Kyoto - while still maintaining the same old footdragging.