View Single Post
Old 02.04.2008, 12:04 AM   #7
gmku
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 15,225
gmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's assesgmku kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by barnaclelapse
I thought Tom Petty & Co. were a lot better than Prince myself.

Though I will say those were far from the best live versions of those songs that I've heard.

I think, it's the fact that Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers actually look like they're having a good time playing music and that they'd play just as well and with just as much natural enthusiasm and energy if they were playing at some suburban picnic for a couple dozen people than at the Superbowl.

Prince acted like...well...Prince.

Pretentious as hell and so wrapped up in himself that I'm amazed he knew where he was at all.

I dunno. He's just a lot of bland pop music to me.

But that's just one man's opinion.

Ditto for me, re your assessment of the Prince.

As for Petty, I like that he and the band appear to know they're just a rock and roll band, and that modesty is their charm. They don't try for anything over the top, just keeping it to simple 60s-influenced rock and roll, and while they're not my cup of tea every day, they definitely justify their existence.

I like the arrow and heart display. That was pretty cool. Overall, a good live performance.

I do wish Petty would get rid of the facial hair, though. I think past a certain age, beards just make men look older.
__________________
Ever notice how this place just basically, well, sucks.
gmku is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|