View Single Post
Old 05.21.2006, 07:29 PM   #16
ricechex
the destroyed room
 
ricechex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 582
ricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's assesricechex kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by khchris(original)
You can't possibly think you could sue the gov't and win?


I thought you had a POLITICAL SCIENCE DEGREE???

khchris, as posted above, the liability with regards to a lawsuit appears to be turning towards the telcos more than the federal gov't. Things are still developing of course, and word has it that a 3rd party to the telcos may have been more directly involved with releasing the american public's call info. Here is some more helpful info for u:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/19/...defends-story/

and here:

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/17/...ecutive-order/
including:


"Ordinarily, a company that conceals their transactions and activities from the public would violate securities law. But an presidential memorandum signed by the President on May 5 allows the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, to authorize a company to conceal activities related to national security". (See 15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(3)(A))

Just trying to be helpful..
__________________



ricechex is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|