View Single Post
Old 02.19.2008, 11:31 AM   #11
NWRA
children of satan
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 367
NWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's assesNWRA kicks all y'all's asses
BRMC didn't try to ride The Strokes train at all. The NME lumped them together with The Strokes and a few other dissimilar bands because they were trying to convince everyone there was a scene at the time, and all rock bands (no matter what their specific sound) were part of it.

A lot of the songs on BRMC's first album sound like The Jesus And Mary Chain of Psychocandy-era but bigger (in terms of production) and with fuzz rather than screeching distortion; some others, my favourites, are slow, sunburnt drones, like murky shoegazer music. It's a good album but you need to listen to it a few times to appreciate it (apart from the singles).

The second album, Take Them On, On Your Own, is mainly faster and harder, bludgeoning bluesy rock. I think its their best: the songwriting is a bit better, and its subtly more varied (Ha Ha High Babe and Rise Or Fall have effects-laden guitars which make them sound like electro).

HOWL is brilliant in the tradition of following noisy albums with a stripped down, simple detour (like The Velvet Underground's S/T, JAMC's Darklands): classic songwriting and lots of instruments, though their lyrics are clichéd ('man in black / redemption / preachers' Johnny Cash twaddle).
NWRA is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|