Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sonic Youth 37
|
HAHA i remember reading this article awhile back and thinking WTF?!?!?! like the obvious questions come to mind as how does one rate the existence of music on a scale? so what defines a 10? how do achieve a rating of 10? and how does Pitchfork know what a 6.8/10 means on the whole progressive history of music??? music is ongoing and not "definite" it hasn't ceased so how can they rate it on a scale??? they aren't just rating an album on its own merits, that is different, they are rating the history?!?!? huh???
this is just one example of how pitchfork's credibitility is truly called into question and shows how ridiculus and foolish and to a degree how pompous snobs they can be about music, i mean exactly again WTF?!?!? so in this case who died made them "god of music"...