|
Well, I guess I'll repeat myself again too.. I don't see the point in their coverage when it's focused on some simple reissues.. if someone doesn't know the sun city girls but reads this Pitchfork article giving bad/mediocre scores to some reissues, they probably won't bother checking the band out. However, there was a just-released singles collection last month that is pretty much perfect, a "9.5/10" by pitchfork standards perhaps but pitchfork didn't even bother mentioning it... I was questioning moreso why they bothered covering some old dusty reissues rather than a brand spankin' new collection of hits. So, again, why bother covering them at all if you're going to be half-assed about it? It just seems silly. I wasn't trying to make some important statement or anything, just noting the humor of the situation.
Anyway, regarding last.fm and completely off-topic here, I just started using that site a couple of months ago, and I don't really use it like most people do (I don't "scrobble"), but I reccomend everyone go to that site if they're interested in hearing new music. I just go around and search for similiar artists to bands I like. I've found so many amazing bands on there in the past 3 months that it's mindboggling.
__________________
|