View Single Post
Old 07.08.2008, 07:40 AM   #61
ploesj
invito al cielo
 
ploesj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: antwerp.
Posts: 2,901
ploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's assesploesj kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucyrulesok
i think its really interesting how the ideals of beauty change according to that which is hard to achieve. back in the day (like Elizabethan times and shit) it was considered attractive to be pale and chubby, because yr average joe was out in the fields all the time and half starved, so was skinny and tan. But now being chubby and pale means you've been sitting at an office desk all year like everyone else, which is hardly sexy, is it?

indeed, but now everyone is going crazy about health and stuff, the meaning of a tan might be changing soon. (i'm so healthy, i stay out of the sun and i won't get skin cancer!)

although i don't really think it will change that soon, if you read any women's magazine, they all state stuff like 'oh a tan is so pretty, but too much sun is so bad... use selftanner!'

so i guess the amount of orange people will just rise.
__________________
blog

flickr


 
ploesj is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|