View Single Post
Old 08.28.2008, 04:15 PM   #8
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,729
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricechex
hard to imagine editors who blurred this ad didn't notice. So I'm thinking they tried to mock the "change" theme and just left it..which i think is only a fraction better than deliberately designing it that way.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain...HANG_0828.html


Quote:
"Is this a coincidence?" one diarist wrote. "People spend hours and hours editing political ads, I really don't see how this could go unnoticed by the editors. Maybe they saw it and thought it wasn't noticeable or maybe they thought it wasn't important."

oh fuck yeah, i agreee with this guy, i edit video for a living and fuck if i don't see every virtual pair of tits in every frame. and with that kramer dude still going apeshit about pitchforks up peopel's ass, this is not farfetched.

my verdict: ON MOTHERFUCKING PURPOSE.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|