View Single Post
Old 09.01.2008, 06:45 AM   #17
atsonicpark
invito al cielo
 
atsonicpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 28,843
atsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's assesatsonicpark kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Everyneurotic
i have been thinking about this for a long time, the noise double standard: noise people hate cd-rs that have xeroxed artwork and no artwork discs, writing them off and shit; but then, these same people love tapes that come with xeroxed artwork and no artwork cassette, while i understand that tapes are warmer than cd-rs, i don't know why people make such a big fuss over this. tapes started to become an indie label standard because it was easy and cheap to make multiple copies of a release, now you can do the same for cheaper on cd-rs, so what the fuck?

i know some people are completely lazy and uncommited to their releases, not even bothering to cut and fold the covers right or anything, let alone demonstrating more of an overall effort on packaging. but if done right, what's the problem?


Yeah man, I got a review, I posted about this elsewhere.. but I individually made art but also copied some art and tracklisting and stuff and put it in a little paper case and spray painted over a cd-r and it played fine.. I did this for fifty cd-r's... and mailed to 50 different people.

And there'sa vital weekly review that's like "great music but the packaging sucks so i'm not going to review it." No kidding. So ridiculous.
__________________




 
atsonicpark is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|