View Single Post
Old 09.14.2008, 05:40 PM   #59
!@#$%!
invito al cielo
 
!@#$%!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,731
!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses!@#$%! kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by demonrail666
I mean who would honestly say that they thought multi-national corporations had no social obligations?

i thought that had more to do with the free market vs. socialism economic model in the "left/right" axis, not libertarian/authoritarian that's more aimed at social issues (in this test anyway). so it's flawed labeling as well, but that's another story...

of course we all want globalization to benefit "humanity", but there's no room for consideration that maybe the progress of business and commerce actually benefits humanity. so it's a very narrow-minded approach to whatever issues they're trying to present before you.
!@#$%! is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|