Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mangajunky
One crime definitely has nothing to do with the other, however it implies that he's a habitual thug.
It's pretty brazen that he was going to publish a book called "If I Did It".
Do I think he murdered them, yup. Does my opinion mean anything. Nope. He was found "not guilty".
I still don't understand the California legal system that finds him not guilty in a criminal trial but guilty in a civil trial - it's either one or the other. The second trial shouldn't have happened if he was found not guilty in the first.
|
you misunderstand. the second trial is in Las Vegas for an entirely unrelated crime, which people have taken the sentiment of "he got away with it" in regards to the first case and nailed him to the wall like Jack de Molay!