View Single Post
Old 01.20.2009, 09:15 AM   #14
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead-Air
When the guitarist creates sounds that are aesthetically pleasing for me, then that is "good" guitar playing to me.

I think that's true to a point. Although I also think it's possible to acknowledge that someone is a 'good' guitarist even if what they do doesn't please me. (Pat Metheny, for example, is not a guitarist I like, but is, I believe, a 'better' player than, say, Julia Cafritz, who I do).

I suppose for me, a 'good' guitarist is someone with the technical ability to play a number of different styles and not have to avoid more complex ones because their skill-levels won't permit it. It's likely that Metheny could get to grips with any Pussy Galore riff fairly quickly, while it's unlikely that Cafritz could cover a Metheny tune. Which has nothing to do with whether I actually like them or not.

I say this as someone whose guitar playing makes Julia Cafritz look like Django Reinhardt.
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|