View Single Post
Old 01.23.2009, 10:07 AM   #6
demonrail666
invito al cielo
 
demonrail666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
demonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's assesdemonrail666 kicks all y'all's asses
In principle, healthcare should be recession proof. The problem is the way organisations are governed. They need to be seen to be cutting costs (usually by reducing their wage bills) in order for them to look efficient in the eyes of those bodies funding them.

Saying that, in the UK at least, the sight of nurses (and maybe primary school teachers) being laid off in order to save money would cause a massive national outcry to the extent that they are probably the only body that will remain untouched by any upcoming recession.

EDIT: I emphasise this as being the case in the UK rather than, say, the US, simply because of our nationalised health and school system.
demonrail666 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|