View Single Post
Old 02.23.2009, 08:53 AM   #122
[Sandbag]
100%
 
[Sandbag]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 820
[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses[Sandbag] kicks all y'all's asses
i can say a few things.
i can see repetition and regression in music, but it is mostly in mainstream shitty bands. and yeh, it's a pain in the arse to the NME or Pitchfork to wank about something saying how innovative they think it is when it's clearly not nor even interesting, but it's their nature.... they pick the bands, they make a big deal about them, they forget about them and write again about another.

still, in the 'underground'(in it's good connotation of this term) scene you can still find pretty interesting shit..

the only problem is that the mainstream music media cant find any interesting bands that sound remotely different to any random myspace music artist... but again that's not the only way to get music.
[Sandbag] is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|