View Single Post
Old 02.27.2009, 02:26 PM   #9
acousticrock87
invito al cielo
 
acousticrock87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,515
acousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's assesacousticrock87 kicks all y'all's asses
I know this is far from the point of the thread, but I rather like pop music and I really try never to "go against the grain" for the sake of going against the grain. But really, I don't think anything Nirvana released was anywhere near the quality of Bleach. (Except maybe the last 4 songs on Incesticide.) Like it's an opinion (just an opinion) that I can't even fathom losing. Nevermind was catchier, but that's about all I see.

I don't want this to turn into another Nirvana thread, though. I just had to say it in response to the article's claim that thinking Bleach is better is "contrarian" and not "valid."
acousticrock87 is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|