View Single Post
Old 03.31.2009, 05:20 PM   #57
LifeDistortion
expwy. to yr skull
 
LifeDistortion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 2,457
LifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's assesLifeDistortion kicks all y'all's asses
 



VS.


 



So I was watching "Resident Evil: Extinction" earlier today and it occured to me that infected zombies seem to be the new thing with zombie movies, and while 28 Days Later was not the first to do the zombies as a infection/disease metaphor they were arugable the most well known. I also know that George Romero has said he hated fast moving zombies which seems to be what the "infected" zombies of this movie as well as the "Resident Evil" films seem to enjoy. So I was curious what you guys think. Do you preffer the zombies as re-animated dead who just stumble around, or are you a big fan of the zombies as infection/disease who run like rabid cannbialistic animals? I've also heard that Danny Boyle is thinking of doing a third 28"" Later.... film. I like both types but I do really like the zombies as rabid animals approch of 28 Days Later.
LifeDistortion is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|