|
decartes failed, but that is where i think the proof of dualism is. he went strictly into a cold mathematical reason... or warm, whatever you prefer. he thought therefore he was. and critics said, i think, that he couldn't prove the end of the statement. he could think, therefore... finis.
but does it really matter? he was still alive. what is the counter argument for a basic dualism? life/death. number lines vs. infinity. order/chaos etc etc.
objective/subjective
|