View Single Post
Old 09.27.2009, 06:54 PM   #71
Lurker
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: No. 10
Posts: 3,289
Lurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitemusic
Nobody suggested that. He suggested that if we went closer to what we need versus our insane lives of luxury and waste, there would be enough energy, food, etc for the people dying in Africa and other countries to live off of. This is proven fact. It doesn't have anything to do with innovation, and it won't stop it because people always want more

True. What I said wasn't part of the main argument, just a side note in response to this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous
the world can handle 48 billion people so long as we stop living greedy, wasteful and consumer based lives..

If we had maximum capacity population it would be pretty shit.
Lurker is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|