Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lurker
I'm saying that with maximum capacity population there won't be any "resourceful wealthy".
Does poetry fit into that? I don't think so as you can't make any money from it even nowadays when not everyone is working just to live and people have money to spend on books of poetry.
Again, in the situation I'm talking about in which we have the biggest population that can survive, everyone will be living on the bare minimum they nees. There won't be any philanthropy: there'll nothing to give!
No, not all innovation is economically driven. I mentioned poetry. Companies on the other will be driven to innovate to make money. My point is that in the situation I'm talking about there won't be any money for innovation because all funds will go into survival...in fact there wouldn't be any funds, everyone would be given rations: rationed food, rationed clothes etc.
This isn't relevant to what I was saying.
|
Well, none of your posts seems to be relevant to the actual discussion so I guess we're all even.