View Single Post
Old 10.08.2009, 05:12 PM   #96
Lurker
invito al cielo
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: No. 10
Posts: 3,289
Lurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's assesLurker kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
Those who can do, Those who cannot, teach. This is an erroneous statement.


Those who can, Do. Those who cannot, philosophize.


Not that I think philosophy itself is a waste of time I am a bit apprehensive about literary critics dipping into and of philosophy style literary theory.

I think this is useful:

Rene Wellek, letter to FR Leavis:
http://courses.essex.ac.uk/LT/LT204/WELLEK.HTM

Reply from Leavis (the important bit):

http://courses.essex.ac.uk/LT/LT204/LITCRI~1.HTM
Lurker is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|