View Single Post
Old 10.30.2009, 10:36 AM   #41
floatingslowly
invito al cielo
 
floatingslowly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 21,165
floatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's assesfloatingslowly kicks all y'all's asses
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genteel Death
This is the sort of comments that generally try to justify the bad state of things, while ending up condoning it, for whatever reason. What ''there's no point in talking about music here'' can possibly mean on a forum dedicated to a band, not a motorcycle or a dishwasher? Of course people chat about whatever tickles their fancy on the non-sonics section, it's there for that reason, but two-thirds of this forum are meant for music-related things, and it's been a while since the activity on there (the non-sonic sounds especially) has scaled down due to the overwhelming amount of mutual masturbation that goes on here daily. Fair enough, it's an internet forum like there a million others (I post on another two regularly), albeit one of one my favourite bands.
I'm not trying to justify or condone anything. that would imply that I had a vested interest in the non-sonic sounds section. I don't. saying that it feels like prickery doesn't mean that I'd want it to continue as such. again, don't care so much about that sub-forum. when I want to talk about music, I do it "IRL".

what I meant by "there is no point" is: to many music threads become about who posted what first. there's too much perception of intellectual ownership here.
floatingslowly is offline   |QUOTE AND REPLY|