|
As with many such debates, the issue of confrontation lies within confusion over the meaning of "marriage." I believe notyourfiend was criticizing the genealogy of marriage as a socio-economic institution, as per her typical Foucauldian vantage.
However, in rebuttal, marriage should not be solely defined by its social and legal expression. To interpret girlgun, marriage is legitimized by being a practice that precedes social norms and legal privileges. In essence, a couple joined in marriage are so in virtue of being joined above all else. To them, marriage as an institution is secondary.
|