Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dr. Eugene Felikson
I don't see much ambiguity between definite truth and claiming that there is no definite truth.
|
You don't see any peculiarity in claiming there is an indefinite truth that is metaphysically separate from definite truth? Wouldn't an indefinite truth be no truth at all? How is it even possible to observe and delineate between entities and observers from outside ourselves as observers? Through logical self-reflection? Is there a mathematical proof or are we resigned to assume it as axiomatic? If truth is formal proof, how does that relate to facticity in the world? Or, instead, is objective truth only what is a fact in the world? If so, we return to the problem of our own position as observers that obscures what a fact is without being conditioned by observation.
No ambiguity, you say? Perhaps you can clarify all this for me.