Quote:
|
Originally Posted by !@#$%!
you realize, knox, that every time a woman starts flaunting her entities on this board, that's all that people are going to talk about her from that point onwards, right?
that's more or less what happened to poor notyourfiend and her famous northern mountains. she was very smart, a good debater, knowledgeable & all, plus she wasn't attracted to men, but it was difficult to peel one's eyes away after she brought them up, with pictures. a shame truly. same with girlgun's cleavage, which obscured any other virtues she may have had. we're hardwired boobhounds.
by comparison, look at all the fools talking about their cock and getting plenty ignored. it could be that women are more evolved beings, or it could be simply that a woman's body is a thing of beauty while the male turkey neck is a constitutionally ugly and malformed thing.
come to think of it, we don't just objectify women-- we objectify every fucking thing on this planet. so don't take that personally.
|
Dear,
I realize a lot of things. And I have to disagree with you (tho I still love you very much).
No longer the excuse "males are shitty beings who can't help but being shitty" please. People's morals are not defined by gender. The truth is "in this society/context we've been told we can get away with behaving like this so we just might" (the trick is to say "that's just how men are").
Which leads me back again to, lots of nauseating crap and half-assed half-serious beliefs are present in this thread. None were as blatantly sexist as Sonic Gail's comment. A woman. So as we all know, women are VERY much responsible for the perpetration of these gender roles.
Now, is a woman supposed to watch and control every aspect of her behaviour because she's a constant target? Is she supposed to model herself and be under constant surveillance in order not to be associated with a certain stereotype? That because she has to assume others are not capable of seeing her as a thinking being after she talks in anyway about anything remotely sex related or a part of her body?
Are you warning me? If so, thank you? But anyone who behaves like an erratic monkey at the mere thought of so called boobs is too much of a wanker to deserve my attention. Doubt many would dare, because I'm probably too scary anyway.
You're not boobwired. You're just taught it's ok to behave that way. As well as the female body isn't any prettier (of course if you're straight I'd assume you think so), it's just deemed ok to objetify it for centuries and centuries.
We're not more evolved beings. We just grow up knowning that behaving like cock hunters would bring us serious consequences (bad ones).
And as for men being "responsible" for math, science, engineering or whatever. You're smart, right? It has very little to do with the so-called differences between male and female brain and more to do with the fact that we live in a patriarchal society in which women were very recently allowed any sort of education (and we can say still highly imbalanced).
And just a side note, looking is not objectifying.