close your eyes if you think downloading is bad

wearescientists · 11.03.2006, 08:16 PM

for my 100th post...

http://www.ateaseweb.com/mb/lofivers...768-27450.html

PAULYBEE2656 · 11.04.2006, 05:47 AM

downloading isnt bad. its the blatant lack of respect for artists which suck......

wearescientists · 11.04.2006, 09:05 AM

yeah when i was first told about this i was thrown for a loop too...i usually only look at stuff i think i might buy. if i like it i end up buying it on vinyl anyway.

Inhuman · 11.04.2006, 09:44 AM

I don't download. Not altogether, I'll download a few tracks to check out what the band sounds like, then delete them, and I download full albums if I have the record. I never download albums that I don't have, I feel really guilty if I do.

PAULYBEE2656 · 11.04.2006, 12:41 PM

i do download. i download rare shit, stuff i cant get, stuff i havent heard and then i go and buy it. its a great way to discover music but i dont use soulseek or shit like that. i prefer to get my files off actual people!

PAULYBEE2656 · 11.04.2006, 12:42 PM

ok, what the fuck happened to my signature font?????????

atari 2600 · 11.04.2006, 02:16 PM

Looks like the RIAA has dropped another file sharing case where the defendant refused to settle: "Wilke had been accused of the usual malfeasance by the RIAA: sharing music over a P2P network. Instead of settling the suit as many others have done, Wilke denied any wrongdoing." And check this out: "Since the RIAA began filing lawsuits against suspected file sharers in 2003, not a single one has gone all the way to trial. In most cases, the defendants agree to write a four-figure check to the record labels to avoid a drawn-out court case. However, some of the accused are fighting back, and in some cases, it appears that the RIAA is dropping cases to avoid the possibility of losing." Fight the power! And win. Wired's Listening Post reminds us that "no one has ever even been sued for downloading music, only for sharing it."

porkmarras · 11.04.2006, 02:20 PM

Downloading entire albums is still wrong though and it can never replace buying one by a million miles.Let's face it,who wants 40000 mp3s on their pc?

porkmarras · 11.04.2006, 02:29 PM

I don't have p2p software on my pc and rarely download music anymore.When i used to,it almost destroyed my love for it and i'm talking from personal experience only.Even the grubbiest looking of cdr releases has my simpathy for the effort that's been made in at least putting something togheter.

11.03.2006, 08:16 PM	#1
wearescientists bad moon rising Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: chicago Posts: 109	for my 100th post... http://www.ateaseweb.com/mb/lofivers...768-27450.html
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 05:47 AM	#2
PAULYBEE2656 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: wexford, rep of ireland Posts: 6,930	downloading isnt bad. its the blatant lack of respect for artists which suck...... __________________ myspace facebook *twitter*
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 09:05 AM	#3
wearescientists bad moon rising Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: chicago Posts: 109	yeah when i was first told about this i was thrown for a loop too...i usually only look at stuff i think i might buy. if i like it i end up buying it on vinyl anyway.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 09:44 AM	#4
Inhuman invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Montreal Posts: 5,807	I don't download. Not altogether, I'll download a few tracks to check out what the band sounds like, then delete them, and I download full albums if I have the record. I never download albums that I don't have, I feel really guilty if I do. __________________ Inhuman no longer dwells on here. http://about.me/robinbastien
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 12:41 PM	#5
PAULYBEE2656 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: wexford, rep of ireland Posts: 6,930	i do download. i download rare shit, stuff i cant get, stuff i havent heard and then i go and buy it. its a great way to discover music but i dont use soulseek or shit like that. i prefer to get my files off actual people! __________________ myspace facebook *twitter*
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 12:42 PM	#6
PAULYBEE2656 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: wexford, rep of ireland Posts: 6,930	ok, what the fuck happened to my signature font????????? __________________ myspace facebook *twitter*
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 02:16 PM	#7
atari 2600 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 8,213	Looks like the RIAA has dropped another file sharing case where the defendant refused to settle: "Wilke had been accused of the usual malfeasance by the RIAA: sharing music over a P2P network. Instead of settling the suit as many others have done, Wilke denied any wrongdoing." And check this out: "Since the RIAA began filing lawsuits against suspected file sharers in 2003, not a single one has gone all the way to trial. In most cases, the defendants agree to write a four-figure check to the record labels to avoid a drawn-out court case. However, some of the accused are fighting back, and in some cases, it appears that the RIAA is dropping cases to avoid the possibility of losing." Fight the power! And win. Wired's Listening Post reminds us that *"no one has ever* even been sued for downloading music**, only for sharing it."
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 02:20 PM	#8
porkmarras invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: London - UK Posts: 14,313	Downloading entire albums is still wrong though and it can never replace buying one by a million miles.Let's face it,who wants 40000 mp3s on their pc? __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

11.04.2006, 02:29 PM	#9
porkmarras invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: London - UK Posts: 14,313	I don't have p2p software on my pc and rarely download music anymore.When i used to,it almost destroyed my love for it and i'm talking from personal experience only.Even the grubbiest looking of cdr releases has my simpathy for the effort that's been made in at least putting something togheter. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|