![]() |
#1 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
He uses words like 'ebullient' when it'd be easier to write 'happy' and he looks like a hip funeral director. He's a know brainer for a classic TV interview, and I have it on good authority that a lot of female thirty somethings find him a bit snoggable.
Give it up for the man like Will: Novelist/social critic/all around media bad bwoi: ![]() Typically brilliant at a book shop discussion: http://youtube.com/watch?v=MuSm3147rzg |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: wexford, rep of ireland
Posts: 6,930
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
my wife fancies him in a wierd way so yeah, your authority is good.. very funny man.
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#3 |
Posts: n/a
|
He looks like John Cale in that picture.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#4 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That's very true. I never noticed but you're right, he does. An ex of mine was totally in love with John Cale and fancies the pants off Will Self. So maybe that's what it is. I want a John Cale make-over, and QUICK! |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#5 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As a novelist I find him risible in his interminable pantheon of pithy, verbose insouicance; narrative content is substituted for showy word-wankery. As a more acerbic Stephen Fry-style TV pundit he's great.
Seriously a shit writer though.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,461
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
haha him
i watched him yesterday when karl pilkington was havin a chat with him great stuff he seems like a wimpy
__________________
www.instagram.com/alienanal |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#7 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agree with Glice about his novels (although his criticism can be OK). Suffers with the same style problems as Martin Amis (who I also prefer as a critic). However he does possess a certain perversity about him that remains ultimately endearing.( Something that Amis, in his bid to be an American intellectual in everything but actual nationality, never has). In many ways Christopher Hitchens is the aggregate of both.
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#8 |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 367
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree too, his novels have always struck me as too similar (in terms of the style of writing) to Amis' worst novels: sometimes it's literally impossible to understand what is going on, without re-reading, as everything is layered in periphrasis and nothing is said directly. Also, like Amis, he annoys me when he tries to be casually shocking (i.e., 'cunt' said all the time, misogyny).
I wish he'd just write the way that he speaks because he's very entertaining, as that clip proves. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#9 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The thing I just discovered about Amis is how he totally rips off Saul Bellow (I recently finished Herzog.). Entire lines seem lifted from him in a way that is borderline out of order. Bellow is a FAR better writer than Amis so anyone put off by the comparison who hasn't read him (Bellow that is) shouldn't be. Herzog is a genuinely great novel. The nearest I think Amis has ever come to greatness is probably Money, and I'm not even convinced by THAT!
I struggle to think of a really great living british novelist at the moment. Ian McEwan maybe, but he seems less and less interesting with every book he publishes. Ballard I still think is a master but I imagine he's not to everyone's taste. Certainly Britain hasn't produced a figure to match the likes of Bellow, Wolfe or DeLillo. Amis has tried but, as has been discussed, his insights tend to become compromised by his awful style. Zadie Smith's 'White Teeth' was OK but seemed more a reflection of its time than a reflection on them. I haven't read 'On Beauty', but I suppose I should, having heard it's quite good - albeit by the same people that celebrated 'White Teeth'. We're clearly far better at producing entertaining media pundits right now, than we are great novelists. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#10 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Of course, the irony of this statement is that it does have a touch of the Self about it, er, itself. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#11 | |
children of satan
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 367
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
what about Ishiguro? The Remains Of The Day and The Unconsoled have convinced me that he's a great British novelist. I've made a note of getting a copy of Herzog now, sounds like my kind of thing from the synopsis. I think Success is Amis' best, followed by London Fields. They have the problems of all of his novels but the highest memorable-descriptive-phrases-to-nonsense ratio. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#12 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Very conscious daahrlink. I think my point is something to the affect of: there are a handful of writers who have a mastery of English who frighten me; Self is one. Self also entirely fails to say anything that makes me think he's anything other than a wastrell. He has a vocabulary in the region of Derrida, Lyotard, Deleuze, Joyce, Eliot, Hardy but he has the writing style somewhere around Catherine Cookson (but, astonishingly, a far shitter writer).
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#13 |
the end of the ugly
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,122
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dunno, I've got a soft spot for his re-write of Dorian Gray, but nothing else I've read did anything for me. He's always fun as a talking head though.
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#14 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yes, I guessed as much about your self-conscious Self-isms. I think the problem with WS's style, as opposed to someone like Derrida, is that it has no broader function. As we know, the French postmodernist writers were using language as a commentary on language itself while Will Self seems only interested in dazzling the reader with his expanded vocabulary. Regarding NWRA's mention of Ishiguro as a great british novelist - I tend to put him in with McEwan: as a great writer technically, but one that fails to really address big issues in his work in a way that American writers like Bellow, DeLillo, Updike and Wolfe do. The Remains of the Day is a beautiful novel, but ultimately has very little to say about anything. Wolfe's The Bonfire of the Vanities, on the other hand, while not as technically polished, has a grand scale to it that the British really haven't managed to produce, probably since Dickens. It's as though the British literary 'establishment' find such subjects vulgar. Ballard's latest novel Kingdom Come is a great attempt at trying to nail the national zeitgeist, and it's interesting how he remains for many within that establishment something of an outsider, pushed into the ghetto of the science fiction genre. |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#15 | ||
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I'll brush over the use of the 'p' word for now. I think with a lot of writers of the less 'trendy' sort they have a comparable vocabulary to Self but a much greater ability to deploy it. Your menopausal Guardian friendlies (Maeve Binchy, Maggie Atwood or whomever) tend to use their extensive wordsmithery with a touch of grace, élan. If you someone is better known for their words than their content then they're not really a great writer, are they?
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#16 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: psycho battery
Posts: 12,161
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i like will self. some of his books are not that great but as a person he seems ok.
__________________
Sarcasm[A] is stating the opposite of an intended meaning especially in order to sneeringly, slyly, jest or mock a person, situation or thing |@ <------- Euphoric brain cell just moments before expiration V _ \ / _ PING <-------- moments later / \ http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljhxq...isruo1_500.gif |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#17 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 18,510
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I always feel slightly soiled when using the 'p' word. But you know, sometimes it just comes out. like a sicky burp. And no, good wordmithery does not necessarily a good writer make - as my continually aborted attempts at reading most current British novelists proves. At least to me! |
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#18 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Arrived in Smoke, Arrived in Gold
Posts: 2,569
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I went through a phase of being totally into him but have come to regard him as a pure stylist when it comes to novels (still a very good one at that, mind). I prefer his short story collection although I did enjoy Great Apes very much.
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#19 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rennes, France
Posts: 1,264
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I read his short stories (A Short History of the English Novel I especially liked), and Great Apes (but it didn't click), too.
But my favourite is Cock & Bull, which is shorter than his novels, and could be described as two short stories put together, one being deiberately funny, the other lurking on terror - both very efficiently. |
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
![]() |
#20 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,248
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
he's got an impressive vocabulary, but i can't really think of anything to like about him
|
![]() |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |