Originally Posted by Glice

Could you just prick off you insolent cunt?

Or, alternately, yes, you're right - there's an intuitive talent and there's an explicit talent. Most shredders, and nearly all classical musicians, shit on rock musicians on a technical level, or, seeing as you're cloth-eyed, are objectively more talented on a technical level. Talent is a hydra of confusion, perhaps.

Nah, you prick off, you pompous twat. Yeah.

I like the hydra of of confusion explanation more. I might be totally and utterly wrong on this but I have always imagined that the best artists have a way of organising their subconscious in an artistically productive way. I am also very aware that this is more the case with visual and aural artists, rather than, say, writers.

[Glice]

Originally Posted by sarramkrop

Nah, you prick off, you pompous twat. Yeah.

I tell you what - why don't you prick off, you garish windowlicker?

[Glice]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Rhys Chatham

I can't say I could consider Feldman noise.

No, well done there. It's all about texture and duration rather than melodic content. Oh look, that's a lot like noise. Well I never.

[_slavo_]

Originally Posted by Glice

Talent is a hydra of confusion, perhaps.

What a line.

I'm not really sure what it meants, however, it sounds superb.

[Sheriff Rhys Chatham]

I was reading an article about Feldman where it goes on about how he was interested more in the space between the notes than the notes themselves. I just can't imagine a noise artist being more interested in the absence of sound than the sound it's self.

Originally Posted by Glice

I tell you what - why don't you prick off, you garish windowlicker?

You so hurt me I might skip dinner, tonight. Totally and utterly devastated.

[Glice]

Originally Posted by sarramkrop

You so hurt me I might skip dinner, tonight. Totally and utterly devastated.

Huzzah! I'm off for a victorywank.

Originally Posted by Glice

Huzzah! I'm off for a victorywank.

Look at you.

What a twat you are. It doesn't take much to send you in a victorious frenzy, or does it? Such a helium-brained shitface you are. Twat.

[Sheriff Rhys Chatham]

Originally Posted by Glice

Huzzah! I'm off for a victorywank.

Don't hurt your prick.

[Everyneurotic]

"victorywank" hahahahahaha.

[Rob Instigator]

 

have you heard hios solo album? it is HORRID!!
in between songs there is this "spooky" howling wind effect.

so dumb.

[themawt71]

sarramkrop-"I might be totally and utterly wrong on this but I have always imagined that the best artists have a way of organise their subconscious in an artistically productive way. I am also very aware that this is more the case with visual and aural artists, rather than, say, writers."


i think you are right on this. i would also say that the way they organize their consciousness as well has a huge effect.

pauline oliveros is a perfect example of this. her compostions tend to be attention strategies rather than say a collection of notes or textures written out before hand.

i would also say that the conscious and subconscious of the listener plays and equal role in the experience.

thank you

[Dead-Air]

Good experimental music should be something more than noise. Good noise should either get you off, make you forget your identity, or some combination of both.

[terminal pharmacy]

you know what most noise, like most modern art is shit but ocassionally you will find an ooto dix or kandinsky or cage. noise is not something to go and see live, it is to go and experience, which is more akin to hanging a work of art on a wall. I myself much prefer to hear noise within the context of an installation than as someone playing noise. also as Rob Instigator said the noise needs progession and dynamics. Noise for noise sake is boring as shit, noise that has been thought about on a richer level is far more interesting.

give me free improv over noise.......

[Florya]

Originally Posted by Sheriff Rhys Chatham

I was reading an article about Feldman where it goes on about how he was interested more in the space between the notes than the notes themselves. I just can't imagine a noise artist being more interested in the absence of sound than the sound it's self.

Notes? What the fuck are 'notes'?

[atsonicpark]

The same thing that constitutes good music, period.

[SpectralJulianIsNotDead]

Originally Posted by Florya

Notes? What the fuck are 'notes'?

Notes are sounds of indeterminate length.

Originally Posted by themawt71

sarramkrop-"I might be totally and utterly wrong on this but I have always imagined that the best artists have a way of organise their subconscious in an artistically productive way. I am also very aware that this is more the case with visual and aural artists, rather than, say, writers."


i think you are right on this. i would also say that the way they organize their consciousness as well has a huge effect.

pauline oliveros is a perfect example of this. her compostions tend to be attention strategies rather than say a collection of notes or textures written out before hand.

i would also say that the conscious and subconscious of the listener plays and equal role in the experience.

thank you

Aw, thanks. Hold my hand and let's go victorywanking together, all in the knowledge that Glice is a complete and utter twat.

 

[Norma J]

Small doses.

[themawt71]

Originally Posted by sarramkrop

Aw, thanks. Hold my hand and let's go victorywanking together, all in the knowledge that Glice is a complete and utter twat.

 

how nice...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbhZIkUlu1Y