[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by floatingslowly

I want to make violent love to each of you, one by one, as your bf/gf of the opposite and/or same sex lustily watches on while I penetrate your every cavity, ever so deeply.

that way, your bf/gf of the opposite and/or same sex will know, first hand, the pain you feel as they do the same (albeit with less abandon and more discretion).

right. enough talky talk. let's get to fuckin'.

too desperate, sweet peaches

[floatingslowly]

you want to go first, don't you?

I'll be gentle because I can tell you need it that way.

WHO HURT YOU??????

[knox]

I hang out with ex-boyfriends or people who claim to have a crush on me. It's fine, and I can always punch them if it isn't.

[davenotdead]

 

lustypenetrationgifs.com

[E. Noisefield]

Originally Posted by hevusa

In my experience platonic friendship between men and women is almost impossible outside a professional setting (and even hard within one).

girl + guy alone usually = fucking. it is programmed into our beings.

I agree.

I don't have any female friends that I wouldn't probably bang if I wasn't attached and under the right circumstances.

[E. Noisefield]

Originally Posted by floatingslowly

I want to make violent love to each of you, one by one, as your bf/gf of the opposite and/or same sex lustily watches on while I penetrate your every cavity, ever so deeply.

that way, your bf/gf of the opposite and/or same sex will know, first hand, the pain you feel as they do the same (albeit with less abandon and more discretion).

right. enough talky talk. let's get to fuckin'.

baha!

[hevusa]

Originally Posted by E. Noisefield

I agree.

I don't have any female friends that I wouldn't probably bang if I wasn't attached and under the right circumstances.

exactly.

[Glice]

Originally Posted by E. Noisefield

I agree.

I don't have any female friends that I wouldn't probably bang if I wasn't attached and under the right circumstances.

Originally Posted by hevusa

exactly.

By 'exactly' I presume you mean 'this person has exactly the same incapacity to relate to humanity in anything approaching a normal/ healthy way'. Right?

[knox]

Originally Posted by Glice

By 'exactly' I presume you mean 'this person has exactly the same incapacity to relate to humanity in anything approaching a normal/ healthy way'. Right?

ahaha

[Dr. Eugene Felikson]

knox, you can hang out with anyone you like

i promise not to give you a black eye

[Glice]

Yeah knox - I promise I'll totally not eat your liver. PROMISE.

[knox]

Originally Posted by Glice

Yeah knox - I promise I'll totally not eat your liver. PROMISE.

shame

[Glice]

Originally Posted by knox

shame

I've never had a taste for foie gras.

[knox]

it is kind of gross.

[ann ashtray]

I'm very comfortable with it, but only because I think trust is important. Also, if someone is capable of shady behavior, the quickest way to find out is by allowing them to hang out with people of the opposite sex. not allowing them to, if they want to, will cause problems within itself. That's been my experience. I allow my girlfriend (and past girlfriends) to hang out with basically anyone they want, and I expect to be allowed the same in return. Of course, we are sexual creatures and thoughts will be there regardless. EVERYONE thinks about cheating....not doing so is what makes one great and trustworthy in my opinion.

[hevusa]

trust = naive
nearly everyone is fucking around
no matter how secure you are
no matter how much perceived honesty

[ann ashtray]

Originally Posted by hevusa

trust = naive
nearly everyone is fucking around
no matter how secure you are
no matter how much perceived honesty

On some level, sure....but not allowing yr better half to visit friends will possibly create more problems in a relationship than if they were actually fucking around. I don't believe most fuck around, but it's rapidly getting to that point. An affair is the new taboo, seemingly. Whatever. Americans should adapt a more European outlook on relationships....not that cheating is OK, it's not.

[fugazifan]

beyond whether someone cheats or not, this discourse of "allowing" or "not allowing" is quite appalling. who gave anyone the right to "allow" someone to do anything?

[ann ashtray]

Originally Posted by fugazifan

beyond whether someone cheats or not, this discourse of "allowing" or "not allowing" is quite appalling. who gave anyone the right to "allow" someone to do anything?

Agree. Totally. Which is why problems are bound to come as a result of someone saying "I don't want you to hang out with them". Of course, like I always say, there are exceptions to every rule. I would prefer my girlfriend not hang out with a recent ex unless I am present, but even then it's not an "yr allowed" or "not allowed" sort of thing. it's one of those sort of things I consider a: at least they are being honest and telling me, and b: I should be allowed to do the same thing if the situation ever brings itself up. I don't believe in ownership of one human being by another. I don't care how much you love someone, you never "belong" to someone else. In the same regard, as soon as you think someone else belongs to you, the "relationship" has already failed. Trust and honesty are the key to most things.

[Glice]

Originally Posted by hevusa

trust = naive
nearly everyone is fucking around
no matter how secure you are
no matter how much perceived honesty

Wow. Whoever s/he was, s/he really fucked you over, didn't she? I'm sorry.