How long is your hair? - Page 2

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

so you straighten your hair i assume?

HAHAHAHA.

I have totally straight hair.

Cantankerous · 10.24.2006, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

I have totally straight hair.

then why would you look like robert plant or a homeless caveman, you dolt?

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

Yes, but looking like neil from the Young ones, then like Robert Plant, then like some kind of homeless caveman? All much more regrettable than my teenage 80s hairdos.

hm... maybe you were smoking schwag at the time, then?

the point is to always shift the blame elsewhere.

gmku · 10.24.2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

gmku doesn't like people having a good time with their superficial sides.

No, I don't. It's so... superficial.

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:10 PM

Robert Plant: regrettable spiral perm with mid-back length hair circa 1989.
Caveman: extra regrettable dreadlocks.

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gmku

No, I don't. It's so... superficial.

You mean fun, right?

Cantankerous · 10.24.2006, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

Robert Plant: regrettable spiral perm with mid-back length hair circa 1989.
Caveman: extra regrettable dreadlocks.

you have cemented the image of yourself as a retard forever.

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

you have cemented the image of yourself as a retard forever.

maybe in your own mind, sweetie. which does not apply to the rest of us. just saying...

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:13 PM

Hey, I just enjoyed trying shit out.
Some things are better than others, of course.

I got bored with having super long straight hair, but had spent so long growing it in that I wanted to have some fun with it before I cut it all off. I'm not ever growing long hair again.

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:14 PM

what about the schwag though-- you never answered that

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:17 PM

I do not talk Drug Talk on the interweb.

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

I do not talk Drug Talk on the interweb.

har har

let's just say

qui tacit consentire

yes?

==
ps sorry for typo

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:26 PM

I neither confirm nor deny anything about everything.

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:27 PM

very well. but your hair says it all

Cantankerous · 10.24.2006, 04:27 PM

it certainly does.

Hair Tests

Are currently several times more expensive than urine tests (~$100-$150).
Are considered a relatively unintrusive method of drug testing.
Detect substance use over a longer period (see detection period).
Do not usually detect use within the past week.
Require a sample of hair about the diameter of a pencil and 1.5 inches long. They can not be done with a single hair.
Test positive a little more than twice as often as a urine test. In a recent study, out of 1823 paired hair and urine samples, 57 urine samples tested positive for drugs of abuse; while 124 hair samples from the same group tested positive.
Are not significantly affected by brief periods of abstinence from drugs.
Can sometimes be used to determine when use occured and if it has been discontinued. Drugs, such as opiates (codeine, morphine, heroin) lay down on the hair shaft very tightly and are shown not to migrate along the shaft, thus, if a long segment of hair is available one can draw some "relative" conclusions about when the use occurred. However cocaine, although very easy to detect, is able to migrate along the shaft; making it very difficult to determine when the drug was used and for how long.
Claims to be able to reliably differentiate between opiate and poppy seed use.
We've heard that many hair tests now check for more than the NIDA 5, and include at least Cannabis, Ecstasy/MDMA, Cocaine, Opiates, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Phencyclidine (PCP), Benzodiazepines, & Barbiturates (2001).

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

you have cemented the image of yourself as a retard forever.

OK, so I suppose I really should take to heart the fashion-related barbs of a teenage girl who:

Brags that she doesn't own a comb
Habitually dyes her hair (which I suppose I would get crap for in spades were I to do it)
And last but not least, dresses like one of the world's most cartoonish has-beens dressed in her supposed "glory days" 15 years ago, when, I might add, she was still making godawful amateurish crap.

OK, tard me up.

Cantankerous · 10.24.2006, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

OK, so I suppose I really should take to heart the fashion-related barbs of a teenage girl who:

Brags that she doesn't own a comb
Habitually dyes her hair (which I suppose I would get crap for in spades were I to do it)
And last but not least, dresses like one of the world's most cartoonish has-beens dressed in her supposed "glory days" 15 years ago, when, I might add, she was still making godawful amateurish crap.

OK, tard me up.

This is a fallacious argument where you have fallen into one of the three dirty tricks,
"Accuse your opponent of doing exactly as they accuse you of doing." (IE being a retard in this case)
I've got a whole list, and if you want me to keep going, I can do so, bowl cut.

Nice late reaction, by the way.

!@#$%! · 10.24.2006, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

OK, so I suppose I really should take to heart the fashion-related barbs of a teenage girl who:

Brags that she doesn't own a comb
Habitually dyes her hair (which I suppose I would get crap for in spades were I to do it)
And last but not least, dresses like one of the world's most cartoonish has-beens dressed in her supposed "glory days" 15 years ago, when, I might add, she was still making godawful amateurish crap.

OK, tard me up.

ZINGGGG!!!

ow, the gloves have come off...

Cantankerous · 10.24.2006, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

This is a fallacious argument where you have fallen into one of the three dirty tricks,
"Accuse your opponent of doing exactly as they accuse you of doing." (IE being a retard in this case)
I've got a whole list, and if you want me to keep going, I can do so, bowl cut.

Nice late reaction, by the way.

That's a fancy way of saying "kiss my ass."

Savage Clone · 10.24.2006, 04:35 PM

I am merely suggesting that you yourself may one day look back on something you thought was cool at the time, only to discover in hindsight that it was not as cool as you thought. It happens to most of us.

10.24.2006, 04:10 PM	#25
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,287	Robert Plant: regrettable spiral perm with mid-back length hair circa 1989. Caveman: extra regrettable dreadlocks.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:13 PM	#29
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,287	Hey, I just enjoyed trying shit out. Some things are better than others, of course. I got bored with having super long straight hair, but had spent so long growing it in that I wanted to have some fun with it before I cut it all off. I'm not ever growing long hair again.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:14 PM	#30
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,520	what about the schwag though-- you never answered that
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:17 PM	#31
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,287	I do not talk Drug Talk on the interweb.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:26 PM	#33
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,287	I neither confirm nor deny anything about everything.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:27 PM	#34
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,520	very well. but your hair says it all
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:27 PM	#35
Cantankerous invito al cielo Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: A RETIREMENT HOME Posts: 18,499	it certainly does. Hair Tests Are currently several times more expensive than urine tests (~$100-$150). Are considered a relatively unintrusive method of drug testing. Detect substance use over a longer period (see detection period). Do not usually detect use within the past week. Require a sample of hair about the diameter of a pencil and 1.5 inches long. They can not be done with a single hair. Test positive a little more than twice as often as a urine test. In a recent study, out of 1823 paired hair and urine samples, 57 urine samples tested positive for drugs of abuse; while 124 hair samples from the same group tested positive. Are not significantly affected by brief periods of abstinence from drugs. Can sometimes be used to determine when use occured and if it has been discontinued. Drugs, such as opiates (codeine, morphine, heroin) lay down on the hair shaft very tightly and are shown not to migrate along the shaft, thus, if a long segment of hair is available one can draw some "relative" conclusions about when the use occurred. However cocaine, although very easy to detect, is able to migrate along the shaft; making it very difficult to determine when the drug was used and for how long. Claims to be able to reliably differentiate between opiate and poppy seed use. We've heard that many hair tests now check for more than the NIDA 5, and include at least Cannabis, Ecstasy/MDMA, Cocaine, Opiates, Methamphetamine, Amphetamine, Phencyclidine (PCP), Benzodiazepines, & Barbiturates (2001). __________________ RETIRED
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

10.24.2006, 04:35 PM	#40
Savage Clone invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 11,287	I am merely suggesting that you yourself may one day look back on something you thought was cool at the time, only to discover in hindsight that it was not as cool as you thought. It happens to most of us.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|