01.23.2018, 09:07 AM | #4921 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,991
|
Quote:
movies give you jump scares. cheap. easy. predictable. scary books, the real scary ones, create a world that is so real in your head that you experience the terror as if it was happening to you. This happened to me with several Stephen King books in my teens. It also happened with clive barker's first books of blood short stories. when I got older I read HOUSE by Mark Danielewski and, while not horror per se, that book scared the shit out of my inner mind. books freak you out for far longer than a film can.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 09:16 AM | #4922 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,991
|
some writers are important because their use of the language is second to none. (Most of these writers I could give a fuck about. fuck your use of language. I hate florid shit. I want to read a story, not a fucking dipshit showing off how many gerunds he can disseminate)
some writers are important because the subjects and themes they write about had never been done that way before. (Lovecraft is this way. so is Twain, so is conan doyle. Lovecraft was not a good prose writer. no one claims that. his work is more like reading a news account of horrible shit happening. Conan Doyle had very utilitarian prose, but he created the form of the detective novel as we know it. Twain was the best writer of the lot I mention by FAR, but even he is not praised for his prose as much as he is for his ideas, humor, and observation of human nature) Poe was both. he crafted precision in his stories, but he also created whole genres out of thin air.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 09:30 AM | #4923 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,648
|
poe was the king of the cats
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 09:39 AM | #4924 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,305
|
One of my all time favorite creepy books is Wild Palms by Wm Faulkner.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 10:15 AM | #4925 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
|
Oh! "That Evening Sun."
Black washerwoman Nancy Mannigoe fears that her common-law husband Jesus is seeking to murder her because she is pregnant with a white man's child. Her employers, The Compsons, are mostly indifferent. 75% scary, 25% really sad. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 10:39 AM | #4926 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
Ok ok, I was exaggerating for effect. What I really meant was modern horror owes a lot to Lovecraft. Stephen King, Clive Barker, who’s the other one? The other “big” one? Whatever... anyway, all of them just worship on the altar of Lovecraft. But of course not all horror is influenced by him, because he was not the first horror writer (or anywhere near the first). If he actually *pioneered* anything it was the Weird genre, along with Mervyn Peake (in a much different way), and some others who have really excellent anthology SF/horror stories from the 20s-50s whose names escape me at the moment. I exaggerated. Sorry. Blah. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.23.2018, 10:42 AM | #4927 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
One of the scariest stories I’ve ever read is “The Foghorn” by good old Ray Bradbury. There’s a definite element of Lovecraft in that ending (won’t ruin it for anyone who hasn’t read it). Not really *scary* in the way that makes you check your windows, but tense and thrilling and larger than life and kind of apocalypticly awesome.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 08:55 AM | #4928 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,648
|
Quote:
i got the ambrose bierce ebook off gutenberg the other day and gonna read those stories and see what’s up had a superlong day on the road yesterday and i need a break. fiction for breakfast is a good thing. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 09:02 AM | #4929 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,991
|
ambrose's stories are not my fave, b ut his devil's dictionary is the epitome of SNARK!
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 11:58 AM | #4930 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
I’m honestly not sure I’ve ever read anything else. EDIT: OCCURRENCE AT OWL CREEK! Definitely read that one. Probably some others, but yeah. Good story. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 12:02 PM | #4931 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
I’ve been reading Neil Gaiman’s “Sandman” comics, which are really almost more novel than comic. I never read the full series before, and still haven’t, because why would I read a *comic* by an author I love when I could read a *book?* (No, not even I am that nerdy, though I do love me some comics). But I think it’s on par with some of his novels. Definitely top-notch for comics. I’d place it next to Watchmen or MAUS in the pantheon of comic books that deserve to be called “books.” |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 12:10 PM | #4932 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,991
|
sandman rules.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 03:43 PM | #4933 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,648
|
jeezus crackers sandman is the best fucking comic on the planet
if anything ever convinced me comics were worth a second look after childhood, it was that glorious masterpiece just fucking brilliant way better than maus. i mean, maus was a heavy subject but not a great plot. just very serious for a comic. i’d rather read viktor frankl or primo levi on the subject i didn’t like watchmen because i had read borges first and that ruined the suprise of the literary devices they use in it. and i don’t know, i didn’t like the characters either or maybe the capes turned me off. dunno. but sandman. holy shit. hoooo-leeeeee-shitttttttt. sandman!!!! |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 08:50 PM | #4934 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
Sandman definitely > Watchmen, but Watchmen ain’t about capes. I think that book warrants at least two reads. MAUS is more like Persepolis. Different kind of thing altogether, even from these comics, which are very different kinds of things altogether from regular comics. Preacher is also some baller ass shit. Not sure if you’ve read that, but it’s worth it. Show’s obviously great, but the book is great in different ways. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.24.2018, 09:41 PM | #4935 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,648
|
Quote:
i recommend fish. especially small fish at the bottom of the food chain. sardines, herring, anchovies. also apples. also walnuts. all good for memory! also relaxation exercises. reduce stress. clears the head = recollection. don’t you remember you and i talked about a year ago (maybe less, maybe 6 months ago) about preacher the tv show and you liked tulip and all that? and i told you season 1 was a prequel to the actual comic? ok i won’t get sore. but we talked about it extensively! compared it to the comic! ok. so, yes, i’ve read fucking preacher and it’s fucking awesome and you’re right it’s fucking great great great. persepolis vol 1 for my taste beats vol 2 by a million miles. vol 1 is all about escaping and adventure. vol 2 is about, ugh, getting back to prison. a little too bitter for me and lacking structure. but 1 was magick. the problem with maus for me is that it lacks a compelling plot. this happens, this happens, this happens— it’s a document. it’s an important document no doubt, but it’s a document. persepolis documents history as well but i has an actual plot—there is tension in the narrative and it moves you forward. the thing that moves you forward in maus is spiegelman’s inherited neurosis. which, i don’t know, he doesn’t really delve into it. he’s a little cold about everything, a little distant. a little too detached, too american.i was disappointed when i read it. you want to delve into jewish neurosis and historical trauma in the present, read jacobo timerman on the lebanon war. holy mother of fuck. it’s gut-wrenching. he’s argentinian so he doesn’t hold back— he spills his guts in front of you. a brilliant book. a meditation on the horrors of history and about going from victim to perpetrator. deeply, deeply felt. anyway where was i going with this after 7 vodkas? hm... er... yes! plots. right ways of telling a story. a story says this happened first this happened secod this happened third. a plot tells you the story in a more interesting way. and sandman— sandman is the mother of all plots. sandman is full of amazing surprises. sandman takes you one way then takes you another way then you arrive to a place and say huh? and wow. it’s just spectacularly well told. seriously. such a well-told story. masterful. also i know that watchmen is not about capes, it’s about, uh, superheroes being flawed, and borgesian fake documents, and literary devices that were experimental 40 years before the comics. anyway i didn’t like it. i couldn’t like it. so i didn’t like it. and that’s how i didn’t like it. i got it. and still didn’t like it. couldn’t like it. won’t like it. can’t. not interested unfortunately. way the cookie crumbles. a book that warrants at least 2 reads might be, hm, let’s see, borges’s ficciones. everyone should read that at least once. whatta book. also, speaking of adult comics, the first several volumes of FABLES were fucking amazing. later it sort of spun off into a bland mess and i stopped buying/reading, kinda like they were milking their earlier success. but fables holy fuck so smart and so epic. the way the characters got reinterpreted into adulthood was a masterstroke. that alone, what it does for the mythical imagination, hasn’t been valued enough yet. sure it has been copied some in some tv shows, like, grimm or something? they attempt something like that? but no. fables. wow. it destroyed my childhood in all the right ways. it said: these characters grew up with you. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.25.2018, 05:09 AM | #4936 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,879
|
I'll have to re-read MAUS to make sure--it's been at least 15 years--but I'm pretty sure you're totally wrong. ;-)
But I've never heard of Jacobo Timerman and will explore, so thanks, and you may continue to live. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.25.2018, 09:04 AM | #4937 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,648
|
i dont know what it was about maus. i thought it was very good, but somehow i had been expecting more. i think i have problems with the art character. basically i didn’t like him i suppose. he spoils it a bit for me. the dad’s story is amazing. but the son kinda ruins it for me, the fucking brat, ha ha ha ha. i don’t know. he gets in the way of the dad for me i suppose. i really just don’t know.
timerman’s family fled to argentina from russia pre-holocaust. he grew up nevertheless as a refugee and supported by jewish charities to an extent. throughout his life he dealt mostly with latin american politics and wrote about them as a journalist. in the late 70s he’s imprisoned and tortured by the argentinian junta that tortured murdered and “disappeared” some 30,000 people. israel intervenes, they save his hide, take him home (he had been a zionist all his life). he gets there and blam, the lebanon war happens. he then proceeds to bite the hand that feeds him and writes THE LONGEST WAR, where he condems israel and its treatment of the palestinians, mixing recolletions of his refugee childhood with what he’s seeing happen in front of his eyes, and constrasts this mess with the zionist ideals he grew up with. he took a lot of shit for it but wow—it’s a potent read. ETA: oh, the book was mostly ignored at the time of publication and israelis dimissed timerman as in ingrate who didn’t know what he was talking about, so it’s not a famous book by any means and i don’t think it won any awards. but read it and see. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.25.2018, 09:16 AM | #4938 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
Hmm. I’ve never read, but will consider it. Thanks for the history. That’s not great luck. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.25.2018, 09:18 AM | #4939 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the land of the Instigator
Posts: 27,991
|
watchmen is about the myth of the do-gooder hero. it rules.
__________________
RXTT's Intellectual Journey - my new blog where I talk about all the books I read. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
01.25.2018, 11:55 AM | #4940 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 11,798
|
Quote:
We’ve had this conversation before, but it’s aboit a lot of things. Just not really about superheroes. Partly because there’s not a fucking single shred of heroism or altruism exhibited by any of the “masks,” and partly because, while the story may include at least one “super” person, it’s absolutely not a hero’s journey in the Campbellian sense. But yeah, it’s more about the cold hard truths of the world. The “heroes” as depicted in normal comic books are fundamentally at odds with civilization and, y’know, its discontents. In reality, a hero is a human at a point in time before they have become corrupted, either by their own baser instincts or... well, basically fascism. Aaanyway. I just wouldn’t call it a superhero story. At all. A story with so-called “super-heroes” in it? Sure. But all those “heroes” are either deviants, cowards, sociopaths or charlatans (eg deeply flawed, like people). Also Cold War stuff. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |