Is Trump really a serious contender for the Republican nomination? - Page 269

!@#$%! · 12.12.2018, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

I don’t have time for Wiki footnotes, so no clue what you are referring to?
I shared a link to a story that is accurate and TRUE......not conservative or liberal or democratic......simple as that!

lmao

"mr. neutral" xD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

.....Merry Christmas Hillary

no sarcasm intended I'M SURE

evollove · 12.12.2018, 05:56 PM

Fuck, Bytor. I tried.

--In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets

--In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi

--In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting

Etc.

It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior.

A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true.

They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed.

Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested.

!@#$%! · 12.12.2018, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

Fuck, Bytor. I tried.

--In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets

--In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi

--In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting

Etc.

It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior.

A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true.

They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed.

Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested.

he uses those websites like others use inhalants

Bytor Peltor · 12.12.2018, 06:24 PM

The relevance of linking JudicialWatch is they are the ones who filed the lawsuit that led to the judges rulling. Because of JudicalWatch, Hillary will be testifying under oath......simple as that!

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

Fuck, Bytor. I tried.

--In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets

--In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi

--In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting

Etc.

It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior.

A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true.

They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed.

Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested.

!@#$%! · 12.12.2018, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

The relevance of linking JudicialWatch is they are the ones who filed the lawsuit that led to the judges rulling. Because of JudicalWatch, Hillary will be testifying under oath......simple as that!

so they are reporting on their own arbitrary shenanigans

simple as that!

evollove · 12.12.2018, 07:02 PM

The headline reads:

Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath

True.

But the same judge threw out about 75% of the rest of their request. And it's two questions. So the headline is, um, misleading. But exciting. I'll give them that.

The vast majority of Judicial Watch requests get tossed btw.

!@#$%! · 12.12.2018, 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

The headline reads:

Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath

True.

But the same judge threw out about 75% of the rest of their request. And it's two questions. So the headline is, um, misleading. But exciting. I'll give them that.

The vast majority of Judicial Watch requests get tossed btw.

simple as that! xD

Skuj · 12.13.2018, 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

Fuck, Bytor. I tried.

--In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets

--In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi

--In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting

Etc.

It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior.

A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true.

They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed.

Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested.

Oh I get it. Bytor has quoted from Pravda again?

Bytor Peltor · 12.13.2018, 03:46 AM

Wow - didn’t realize Tesla and I own real estate in Canada!

As much fun as it is to read, someone should tell Skuj that he is doing it all wrong!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Oh I get it. Bytor has quoted from Pravda again?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

(Are the teslas and Bytors still unconvinced that any of this is connected to Trump himself?)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

I'd love to see what the teslas and the Bytors are saying about all this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Cue the teslas and Bytors with Alternative Facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Can anyone (other than tesla, Bytor, etc) read that linked piece and think that a tidal wave is not approaching?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Fuck it.....I've put Bytor on ignore, like I did with tesla.

Bytor Peltor · 12.13.2018, 06:20 AM

Thank you for confirming the truth and seeing how that’s the only JW story I linked about the Judges ruling, all the other stuff you were referencing doesn’t apply to my post!

Quote:

Originally Posted by evollove

The headline reads:

Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath

True.

Bytor Peltor · 12.13.2018, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

So, Cohen gets 3 years. It was fascinating what was said at sentencing, by Cohen and other lawyers. I now await the tweets and the spin.

(Are the teslas and Bytors still unconvinced that any of this is connected to Trump himself?)

Cohen pleaded guilty to EIGHT counts:

5 counts of tax evasion
1 count for making false statement to a financial institution
***these six counts from his New Yourk tax company, not related to TRUMP or his campaign***

1 count for excessive campaign contribution on October 27th, same date Cohen finalized payment to adult film star Story Daniels due to a non-disclosure agreement she entered into with Donal Trump

1 count making a false statement to congressional campaign

ZERO ANYTHING related to Russia, collusion or fixing a campaign!!!

The Obama campaign had to pay back millions due to breaking campaign finance laws — MILLIONS!!

So again I ask, where-O-where are the charges coming from?

Let us remember those who have been convicted or pleaded guilty since Trump became POTUS:
-- Trump's personal attorney
-- Trump's former campaign chairman
-- Trump's former WH national security adviser
-- Trump's former campaign adviser
-- Trump's former deputy campaign chairman

And after all of this, NOT ONE thing connecting any of them to collusion, hacking or anything else Muller has been fishing for!

2015: No Collusion
2016: No Collusion
2017: No Collusion
2018: No Collusion

SIMPLE AS THAT!!!

!@#$%! · 12.13.2018, 08:10 AM

@evollove

tell me more about sherrod brown?

i just read this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...199_story.html

george will of all people..

!@#$%! · 12.13.2018, 08:48 AM

lol bytor

evollove · 12.13.2018, 08:55 AM

I skimmed Will and he made some good points. Not sure what info you want.

He's very pro-worker.

Progressive, but in a practical way. Smart as fuck, but not obnoxious.

He has sloppy hair and a gruff voice, and doesn't come off as an elitist. Just a regular dude.

Women seem to love him.

About 20 years ago, he had an ugly divorce. He may have pushed his ex-wife, who pressed charges, then dropped them. He and the ex are friends now, and she endorses him all the time.

Still, the Trumpian fuck he ran against used that. Didn't get a lot of traction, but someone like Trump might make it a huge deal and his lemmings might buy it.

That's the only hiccup. Otherwise, yeah. He could swing a few red states to blue and take the whole thing. It's quite likely.

Skuj · 12.13.2018, 04:58 PM

Is it possible that Mueller could reach out to Mrs NRA Russia Spy Chick?

I've said it before, but recent news/sentencings revolve around the silly little matter of paying off women. Mueller has yet to reveal his Russia cards.

My popcorn is ready.

ilduclo · 12.13.2018, 05:53 PM

Talking to a guy who was calling Mika Berzinskis “ butt boy” comment “ REAL anti gay discrimination.”....nah, not the quite a few gays and non binaries I know...
So I looked up some trumpie actions, goddawful lot, fuck!!

What they do have a problem with is the ACTIONS of religious and trumpie folks trying to screw them over....

https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/...tq-anniversary

https://www.glaad.org/tap/donald-trump

Skuj · 12.13.2018, 06:58 PM

Trump tweeting that someone was rude and should apologize for bad comments is the absolute height of humour. It's Pythonesque.

What's next? The First Lady talking about how internet bullying is bad?

You cannot make this shit up.

!@#$%! · 12.13.2018, 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Trump tweeting that someone was rude and should apologize for bad comments is the absolute height of humour. It's Pythonesque.

What's next? The First Lady talking about how internet bullying is bad?

You cannot make this shit up.

dont forget to say

SIMPLE AS THAT!!!

lmao

new thread requirement apparently

Bytor Peltor · 12.14.2018, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skuj

Mueller has yet to reveal his Russia cards.

My popcorn is ready.

How do we know Mueller has no more Russia cards???

I believe this weekend, especially the Sunday morning news shows, we will hear introduced the topic of Middle-Eastern collision.

You will start to hear rumblings about George Nader setting up meetings between the Trump campaign and multimedia companies......that somehow led to voters being influenced by social media and it all being paid for by Middle-Eastern monies.

Oh, who is now legal representation for George Nader, former White House legal counsel to President Obama......Kathryn Ruemmler aka The Fixer

Everyone have a great Weekend at Bernie's

!@#$%! · 12.14.2018, 07:20 AM

the answer to this thread title:

depends how you define “serious”

12.12.2018, 05:56 PM	#5362
evollove invito al cielo Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,879	Fuck, Bytor. I tried. --In 2014 and 2015, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that ISIS had set up camp in Mexico; Judicial Watch's claims were picked up by several right-wing news outlets --In 2017, Judicial Watch falsely claimed that taxpayer money went into a billboard which depicted President Donald Trump as a Nazi --In 2013, Judicial Watch claimed that the Department of Justice under the Obama administration organized protests against George Zimmermann after the Trayvon Martin shooting Etc. It's a long list of ethically dubious behavior. A lot of the conspiracy bullshit which circulates around right-wing media (and is eventually thoroughly debunked) starts with Judicial Watch. I'm sure at some point in the recent past they wrote something which made you clench your fists in anger, when in fact the story was simply not true. They don't care about the truth. They just want you pissed. Why anyone would go to them as a source is beyond me. There are a handful of respectable conservative outlets, but they are usually thoughtful and not hysterical, so I guess you wouldn't be interested.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.12.2018, 07:02 PM	#5366
evollove invito al cielo Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,879	The headline reads: Federal Court Orders Hillary Clinton to Answer Additional Email Questions Under Oath True. But the same judge threw out about 75% of the rest of their request. And it's two questions. So the headline is, um, misleading. But exciting. I'll give them that. The vast majority of Judicial Watch requests get tossed btw.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 08:10 AM	#5372
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,546	@evollove tell me more about sherrod brown? i just read this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...199_story.html george will of all people..
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 08:48 AM	#5373
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,546	lol bytor
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 08:55 AM	#5374
evollove invito al cielo Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 2,879	I skimmed Will and he made some good points. Not sure what info you want. He's very pro-worker. Progressive, but in a practical way. Smart as fuck, but not obnoxious. He has sloppy hair and a gruff voice, and doesn't come off as an elitist. Just a regular dude. Women seem to love him. About 20 years ago, he had an ugly divorce. He may have pushed his ex-wife, who pressed charges, then dropped them. He and the ex are friends now, and she endorses him all the time. Still, the Trumpian fuck he ran against used that. Didn't get a lot of traction, but someone like Trump might make it a huge deal and his lemmings might buy it. That's the only hiccup. Otherwise, yeah. He could swing a few red states to blue and take the whole thing. It's quite likely.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 04:58 PM	#5375
Skuj invito al cielo Join Date: May 2009 Location: See My Top 10. Posts: 2,686	Is it possible that Mueller could reach out to Mrs NRA Russia Spy Chick? I've said it before, but recent news/sentencings revolve around the silly little matter of paying off women. Mueller has yet to reveal his Russia cards. My popcorn is ready. __________________ Fuckit.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 05:53 PM	#5376
ilduclo invito al cielo Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3,305	Talking to a guy who was calling Mika Berzinskis “ butt boy” comment “ REAL anti gay discrimination.”....nah, not the quite a few gays and non binaries I know... So I looked up some trumpie actions, goddawful lot, fuck!! What they do have a problem with is the ACTIONS of religious and trumpie folks trying to screw them over.... https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/...tq-anniversary https://www.glaad.org/tap/donald-trump
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.13.2018, 06:58 PM	#5377
Skuj invito al cielo Join Date: May 2009 Location: See My Top 10. Posts: 2,686	Trump tweeting that someone was rude and should apologize for bad comments is the absolute height of humour. It's Pythonesque. What's next? The First Lady talking about how internet bullying is bad? You cannot make this shit up. __________________ Fuckit.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

12.14.2018, 07:20 AM	#5380
!@#$%! invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: mars attacks Posts: 42,546	the answer to this thread title: depends how you define “serious”
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|