[_tunic_]

Originally Posted by Antagon

I'm obviously not a fan of them

I first didn't even want to tell you, but you're on my ignore list from now on until the end of times
How dare you, they are pride of the Dutch music scene!


This is what you are


it's so funny that the only Dutch music that is famous abroad is the techno trance gabber bonk bonk bonk bonk boknboknboknboknboknboknboknbokn

[Antagon]

Originally Posted by _tunic_

it's so funny that the only Dutch music that is famous abroad is the techno trance gabber bonk bonk bonk bonk boknboknboknboknboknboknboknbokn

What about Shocking Blue, Golden Earring? It also really depends on what stuff you're into. Go to any goth party in Europe or beyond and those guys are absolutely huge.
This is incredibly off-topic though.

[demonrail666]

This could well be a summer that sees both main parties looking for new leaders. All three, if you consider Vince Cable's standing down from the Lib Dems at the end of July.

EDIT: Labour manage to hold on to Peterborough. So looks like a reprieve for Corbyn?

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

EDIT: Labour manage to hold on to Peterborough. So looks like a reprieve for Corbyn?

was just coming to post this. but... fuck corbyn!

(i guess in your country i’d be a liberal democrat haaahaaahaaa. i think... i don’t know them in person, so not sure...)

eta: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...om-Labour.html

i don’t know what many of these issues are but labor appears to be hot on price controls. on energy? yikes...

[demonrail666]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

was just coming to post this. but... fuck corbyn!

(i guess in your country i’d be a liberal democrat haaahaaahaaa. i think... i don’t know them in person, so not sure...)

The problem with the lib dems is they tend to try and occupy any ground that that the two main parties seem to neglect and which offers a large pool of potential votes, Right now it's the Remain voters who want a 2nd referendum, a few years ago they were trying to attract students by offering to abolish tuition fees, only to then form a coalition with the Tories and raised them. They have a real credibility problem and although they did pick up a lot of votes in the EU election, I think a lot of people still see them as quite cynical opportunists with no real core set of beliefs. Right now they feel like a bit of a New Labour tribute act, ten years ago they were the Left wing alternative to New Labour.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

The problem with the lib dems is they tend to try and occupy any ground that that the two main parties seem to neglect and which offers a large pool of potential votes, Right now it's the Remain voters who want a 2nd referendum, a few years ago they were trying to attract students by offering to abolish tuition fees, only to then form a coalition with the Tories and raised them. They have a real credibility problem and although they did pick up a lot of votes in the EU election, I think a lot of people still see them as quite cynical opportunists with no real core set of beliefs. Right now they feel like a bit of a New Labour tribute act, ten years ago they were the Left wing alternative to New Labour.

oooh! i see... that’s fucked up.

[!@#$%!]

 

 

lmao

[h8kurdt]

"Just saw Michael Gove in South London"

"Tooting?"

"Probably, he was in and out the toilets a lot"

[demonrail666]

Boris way ahead in the 1st leadership election vote. Looks like it'll be a straight fight between him and Hunt.

[h8kurdt]

God I wish it was a straight forward fight. I'd pay to see that Boris "the slugger" Johnson vs Jeremy "the slayer of the cunt" Hunt

[demonrail666]

 

"Don't make me angry. You won't like me when I'm angry"

[demonrail666]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i perceive this to be offensive against my person. i ask that you be taken away in handcuffs



common sense? my sense is anything but common. so another person has perceived this as discriminatory. we ask that you be levied a fine.

==

lmao. insane.

im still trying to wrap my head about the bullshit condition of your laws. am i insulting the honor of your past parliaments when i say this? is this offensive? are you offended?

holy fucking shit. my mind is blown.

i think you need to become radicalized lmao. this is beyond your universities i swear. you’re all being muzzled and anyone can claim control of the leash by proclaiming themselves a victim. you’re going to muzzle each other into irrelevancy.

We've moved quite a way from this being a book discussion so thought I'd move it here ...

No, not offended at all.

my work gives me a special interest in what's going on at universities but I'm aware it's a far bigger problem within society at large. But a side of me now just wants the lunacy to accelerate till it collapses altogether, under the weight of its own madness.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

We've moved quite a way from this being a book discussion so thought I'd move it here ...

No, not offended at all.

my work gives me a special interest in what's going on at universities but I'm aware it's a far bigger problem within society at large. But a side of me now just wants the lunacy to accelerate till it collapses altogether, under the weight of its own madness.

i know you werent offended, was just more satire. since anyone can perceive offense (offence), and your laws suck, maybe the mps would feel harassed by the putdowns. lol.

that’s very maoist, the wanting the contradictions to accelerate. i dont know that it’s a good thing. but maybe.

anyway i thought the reading place was right for this. since you guys are breeding the last man, i was about to suggest nietzsche.

[demonrail666]

It's not Maoist. Mao wanted to accelerate revolution, whereas Accelerationism works WITH (rather than against) the very thing it seeks to overcome by pushing it to its extreme until it becomes so untenable that it forces a revolutionary response. I wasn't being 100% serious in advocating it but, nonetheless, it's totally unrelated to Maoism.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

It's not Maoist. Mao wanted to accelerate revolution, whereas Accelerationism is a specific social theory that works WITH (rather than against) the very thing it seeks to overcome by pushing it to its extreme until it becomes so untenable that it forces a revolutionary response. I wasn't being 100% serious in advocating it but, nonetheless, it's totally unrelated to Maoism.

oh, that was the wrong... end. mao was all about “contradiction”. his rework of hegel et. al.

see:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/a...1/mswv1_17.htm

once i had to deal with some fucking maoists who wanted no peace but were all about exacerbating/intensifying/making obvious the “contradictions,” and some things might have been lost in translation (and memory) when i said accelerate.

and maybe that wasn’t the official party line, but your idea reminded me of that—embracing the “contradiction” and pushing it till it “resolves”

i had never heard of this accelerationism business, so i had no referent for it, and will now go looking for info.

but see, one can find maoism even in the unmentionable. i will go post that link in its thread because i want no part of that here.

[demonrail666]

Like I said, I was only half serious about the Accelerationist thing. If it has one thing in common with Maoism, it's a nice idea when confined to a seminar room but likely to cause far more harm than good when applied to the real world.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

Like I said, I was only half serious about the Accelerationist thing. If it has one thing in common with Maoism, it's a nice idea when confined to a seminar room but likely to cause far more harm than good when applied to the real world.

aaah half serious

 

maoism overall is seriously shit though.

i was only referring to the “metaphysics” of it though, in your stated (joking) wishes.

anyway, this can’t be news. we’re in the wrong thread lol.

let’s talk about the further crashing of the pound. i missed out on last week’s action due to... some goddamn distractions. which were necessary, but stilll... uuuffff....

[demonrail666]

The big news here is obviously the tory leadership contest, which is being stupidly dragged out over a series of knockout rounds. Just have a final members' vote involving all remaining candidates, and have done with. Whoever wins it (and everyone knows it'll be Boris) has only got until October 31st to get a deal so why waste time?

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by demonrail666

The big news here is obviously the tory leadership contest, which is being stupidly dragged out over a series of knockout rounds. Just have a final members' vote involving all remaining candidates, and have done with. Whoever wins it (and everyone knows it'll be Boris) has only got until October 31st to get a deal so why waste time?

ok i’d like to ask...

what kind of person is this boris guy?

reckless? narcissistic? cunning? competent? what exactly?

[demonrail666]

all the above except competent