08.02.2008, 05:02 PM | #5441 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
Don't diss the pentax!
I have a bizzare loyalty to their old cameras based solely on the fact my dad has had an S1a since long before I was born - and still works fine too. The rangefinder is a Voigtlander, really Cosina. It uses the Leica M mount and, the good part is that new with a 21mm lens it's around half the price of a secondhand Leica M6 body. At least in my part of the world. Fully mechanical too, with a metal body. Batteries only needed for metering.
__________________
moo. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:05 PM | #5442 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the land where large fuzzy dice still hang proudly like testicles from rear-view mirrors
Posts: 5,949
|
Quote:
I don't mind old pentax cameras, it's their lenses that kinda bother me. I dig Leica though. Wish I could find one of them cheap, like you said Though I must say my heart is true to Canon. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:09 PM | #5443 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: if there is a bright spot in the universe, the farthest point from it
Posts: 9,443
|
All day Junkyard Wars marathon is almost over.
__________________
"One: Where's the fife? and Two: Gimme the fife." |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:12 PM | #5444 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
The Leicas, pre M8 anyway, are just perfect. I'd love one but I don't think I could ever justify the money. But if I ever did get around to buying one, I'd probably be too wary to use it properly on the street.. thereby defeating the purpose.
Bleh. I want the 40mm lens above to go with my mx, it makes for a great combination:
__________________
moo. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:17 PM | #5445 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the land where large fuzzy dice still hang proudly like testicles from rear-view mirrors
Posts: 5,949
|
Quote:
Yeah, they're crazy expensive I've thought about either getting an old pentax or maybe a minolta. Only thing is the lenses are crazy hard to find for old minoltas, even for new ones, since they went outta business. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:23 PM | #5446 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
Yeah, it's sad what happened to Minolta - and unfortunately the same thing may be on the cards for Pentax. They have been bought out by another Japanese company called Hoya, that deals in optics for medical devices, contact lenses and the like. Even before that, pentax were trying to shift further into that market themselves.
So it remains to be seen whether they'll do a Konica on Pentax or not. What sort of Minolta were you looking at? The Srt-101/201? I've never held one, but they look a nice camera. The MX is cheap, I picked up a body in perfect condition for €100 here, and seen MX+Lens for $150 on some US sites.
__________________
moo. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:26 PM | #5447 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
We have some Hoya filters. We have an old Pentax ME Super camera, but I don't really use it because - gasp! - digital is so good. I have been utterly converted. Pentax have been a really good brand; it will be a shame if they fall.
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:26 PM | #5448 | |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Digital is great, I'm just a sucker for the clockwork cameras
__________________
moo. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:28 PM | #5449 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
Digital scores on so many fronts that I have basically given up on the old cameras. They are lovely though; I like all those old Russian ones.
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:30 PM | #5450 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the land where large fuzzy dice still hang proudly like testicles from rear-view mirrors
Posts: 5,949
|
Quote:
Gawd, it seems like every camera company besides the 'big' ones are starting to just give up or be bought out. Yeah, I was looking at the SRT 101. I've shot with one a few times and they're just excellent cameras. I like my current film camera but it's super noisy and bulky, so I'd like a smaller one. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:32 PM | #5451 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
Because of digital, I do question the long term viability of the camera makers. There will presumably always be a market for SLR's and the like.
But with cameras being integrated into phones, and the technology being refined month on month - how many people are going to bother going out and getting a point and shoot jobby if their phone does it just as well?
__________________
moo. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:35 PM | #5452 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
I have to say that our digital point and click (a Pentax!) is inferior to some mobile phones (it takes some great pictures though), but the digital SLR (Sony A200) is wonderful. We bought the 75-300 lens for it a couple of weeks back, and it slaughters the pictures we used to take on the old ME Super.
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:39 PM | #5453 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 421
|
My dad got a Nikon D300 a few months back and the results are brilliant.
I'm not someone who thinks film is vastly superior or anything, like I said, I just prefer the old cameras for whatever reason. I'd actually love to see someone make a manual dslr - no auto modes and a metal body
__________________
moo. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 05:41 PM | #5454 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 9,397
|
That would be nice.
__________________
Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. http://www.flickr.com/photos/outsidethecamp/ |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:11 PM | #5455 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,662
|
Melly likey digital photo talk
Digital > film photos, taking them to be developed, and realising that I've fucked up every goddamn picture! Argh. (Seriously though, I have mondo respect for all the "proper" photo takers here - you rule bigtime.
__________________
Snow on Easter Sunday - Jesus Christ in reverse. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:13 PM | #5456 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the land where large fuzzy dice still hang proudly like testicles from rear-view mirrors
Posts: 5,949
|
I love film as long as I get to develop the film and photos by myself, and not leave them in the hands of someone I don't know.
Digital is good if you're experimenting with various techniques cause you don't have to worry about wasting film. I dunno, I love both. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:15 PM | #5457 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,515
|
Quote:
I don't, though, so I stick to digital. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:42 PM | #5458 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 3,762
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:42 PM | #5459 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 3,762
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
08.02.2008, 07:49 PM | #5460 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 3,762
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |