[nature scene]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

well see that supports my point refuting suchfriend (sorta): one can't blame the 2-party system for the way alternative political organizations are so shittily run. that's a matter of self-determination and a love of failure.

so true.

[✌➬]

Nader is getting my vote. Screw you guys, i don't want my vote to count.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ✌➬

Nader is getting my vote. Screw you guys, i don't want my vote to count.

i'm sorry you were under the delusion your vote counted at all.

[✌➬]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i'm sorry you were under the delusion your vote counted at all.

Hence, I am voting for Nader.

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i'm sorry you were under the delusion your vote counted at all.

amasaganalo! [thank you]

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by uhler

i agree ith nadar more than any of the rest of them, but come on he failed twice badly, no reason to for him to run at all.
.

Nader askes you the American to ask yourself the most important question in democracy, why do you actually support the representative leaders in the first place? Do you pick them because you agree with them, or because it looked like a sure bet? Nader's arguement was that you need to feel confident to vote your conscience, and to represent your actual beliefs in politics, rather then playing some kind of semi-democratic lottery.

[Cantankerous]

nader has no hope because we've got a two party system. a two party system is more stable, obviously it;s our intent to keep it that way, and the american people be damned if we let some tree hugger come and fuck it up!

[LifeDistortion]

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous

Nader askes you the American to ask yourself the most important question in democracy, Do you pick them because you agree with them, or because it looked like a sure bet?

The Democrates picking a woman and a bi-racial man over a white male from the south is most certainly not a "safe-bet".

[nature scene]

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous

Nader askes you the American to ask yourself the most important question in democracy, why do you actually support the representative leaders in the first place? Do you pick them because you agree with them, or because it looked like a sure bet? Nader's arguement was that you need to feel confident to vote your conscience, and to represent your actual beliefs in politics, rather then playing some kind of semi-democratic lottery.

Nader has no monopoly on the idea that people should vote their conscience.

And representing one's actual beliefs in politics is some advice he could take:
Every other phrase out of his mouth is about the evils of corporations and the capitalist structure, yet he himself has several million dollars worth of stock and mutual funds in (gasp) corporations.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by SuchFriendsAreDangerous

amasaganalo! [thank you]

i was simply poking fun at synth, because he voted for hillary in the california primary. please don't appropriate my mockery of an individual for your own general purposes.

[nature scene]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i was simply poking fun at synth, because he voted for hillary in the california primary. please don't appropriate my mockery of an individual for your own general purposes.

pwned.

[tesla69]

Originally Posted by Lethrneck4

my question is how many people here who supported nader in 2000, now hate him? i bet a lot, and im not surprised....im convinced people like tesla and !@#$% voted for nader in 2000, with many here.
hypocrites,,,as i always say, this board is full of them

I think I unenthusiastically voted for Gore in 2000. I honestly don't remember.

I'm not sure how that makes me a hypocrite. But we couldn't have leatherneck show up without him calling people names. He's a real classy guy.

[mangajunky]

Originally Posted by tesla69

I think I unenthusiastically voted for Gore in 2000. I honestly don't remember.

I voted for Nader in 2000 because Gore was going to win NY pretty easily and I thought it important to help bring some issues to the table.

The issues that Nader is pushing now have become moot. Is he pushing any issues? If he is, it's all getting drowned out by the collective groan of people on both sides of the aisle wondering if he's going to be a spoiler for the other candidate. he won't. He's barely relevant anymore.

[Rob Instigator]

only question I have is, does Barack Hussein Obama like BLACK SABBATH??

 

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

only question I have is, does Barack Hussein Obama like BLACK SABBATH??

 

he's a late boomer aka jim jones generation so i'm gonna guess yes?

[Rob Instigator]

 

wouldn;t that be something? a president blasting Sabbath classics like Children of the Grave or Supernaut on a late saturday night in the white house?

[!@#$%!]

look @ what i found:

http://overstated.net/2008/01/19/obamas-music-taste

it might not happen after all, but who knows? maybe it's not public knowledge

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by nature scene

Nader has no monopoly on the idea that people should vote their conscience.

And representing one's actual beliefs in politics is some advice he could take:
Every other phrase out of his mouth is about the evils of corporations and the capitalist structure, yet he himself has several million dollars worth of stock and mutual funds in (gasp) corporations.

since when does being and advocate equate with being a monopolist?
oh, "Surely you will say 'Physician, heal yourself! Do here in your hometown what we have heard that you did in Capernaum.' "

"I tell you the truth," he continued, "no prophet is accepted in his hometown. I assure you that there were many widows in Israel in Elijah's time, when the sky was shut for three and a half years and there was a severe famine throughout the land. Yet Elijah was not sent to any of them, but to a widow in Zarephath in the region of Sidon.

and to Rob,

 

i had a six foot poster of this picture on my wall for over a year, fucking life size and shit... but then I replaced it with a huge axis bold of love poster of the same size, cuz I was sicking of looking at bill ward, and I thought jimi needed some attention, this decision having been made at 3:42 in the morning on a mushroom vision. in fact, I made my brother take a solemn oath to take me to the store in the morning when it opened to go buy that jimi poster.

[Lethrneck4]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

god dammit man, you're a dunce and a bore.

holy cow, i think i hit a nerve(then again with people like !@#$% and tesla, hitting that nerve barely takes much, lol)

im 100% sure !@#$% voted for nader in 2000, whined about him in 2004, and now again in 08.hahaha hey !@#$% jump on the leftwing bandwagon like you always do...OBAMA is the NEW NADER!

LMAOOO!

[Lethrneck4]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

well he was the founder of US PIRG and did his seatbelt thing, etc, but yeah, consumer advocate, that's his place. they could also call him "presidentially deluded consumer advocate".

is this anyway to talk about a guy who in 2000, im guessin the majority of people here voted for, including you whiny?