>>the last movie you watched - Page 314

LifeDistortion · 05.05.2009, 12:03 PM

"The Science of Sleep" is a good movie but wanted to love it and only liked it. It had a great trailer.

LifeDistortion · 05.05.2009, 12:04 PM

Thinking of seeing Zombie's "Halloween" to see how much he fucked it up.

Dr. Eugene Felikson · 05.05.2009, 01:15 PM

Not a movie, but currently watching:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek

Hellraiser - 6/10

Really? Only a 6?

atsonicpark · 05.05.2009, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LifeDistortion

Thinking of seeing Zombie's "Halloween" to see how much he fucked it up.

0/10

I just re-watched Dog Star Man. 11/10.

nicfit · 05.05.2009, 03:32 PM

the bank job. kind of a letdown.

atsonicpark · 05.05.2009, 03:39 PM

Yeah, it's pretty boring isn't it? You figured Statham would say FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK and kill everyone. Instead it's one of the most boring heist films I've ever seen. Yawn.

nicfit · 05.05.2009, 03:51 PM

Yes. Not well written at all, even the "mood" is somehow wrong...I'm waiting for Crank 2 ha ha.

Better_Than_You · 05.05.2009, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LifeDistortion

"The Science of Sleep" is a good movie but wanted to love it and only liked it. It had a great trailer.

ah-greed.
------------------
i got through 20 minutes of inland empire before i fell asleep. its too slow to watch late at night.

is it worth the 2 1/2+ hours?? has anyone seen it??
i'm a david lynch fan, but not fanatically so.

Derek · 05.05.2009, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Eugene Felikson

Really? Only a 6?

Wasn't really into it. I liked it though.

Derek · 05.05.2009, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Better_Than_You

is it worth the 2 1/2+ hours?? has anyone seen it??
i'm a david lynch fan, but not fanatically so.

It's one of his more lesser works in my opinion.

atsonicpark · 05.05.2009, 05:07 PM

Yeah, definitely a lesser work. Nothing really happens in it. I've watched it 4 1/2 times... it definitely sticks with you. It's something you probably need to watch once. You'll always think about it... but... really, a good hour could have been cut from it... it's just a bit all over the place.

floatingslowly · 05.05.2009, 06:42 PM

netflix to xbox streams of the last two matrix movies since I've never bothered to watch anything past the first one.

LIEKS:
the machines didn't really lose.
I LIEK KUNGFU IS GUD.
more "real" world.
less "matrix" kungfu.
powersuited terminator marines. (and by terminator, I mean, WH40K).
I RLY LIEK THE VIRUS MR SMITH.

DISLIEKS:
girlgun doing the "ted air-guitar thing", in front of the TV, while I was trying to watch.
watching with my kid and having to explain every gawd damn thing (when I'm not sure even the writers knew WTF).
seeing that "ted air-guitar thing" everytime neo wanted to kungfu the agents.
all the fucking mr. smiths at the end; they would smile at each other and it made me want to kungfu.

davenotdead · 05.05.2009, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Better_Than_You

i got through 20 minutes of inland empire before i fell asleep. its too slow to watch late at night.

is it worth the 2 1/2+ hours?? has anyone seen it??
i'm a david lynch fan, but not fanatically so.

its one of his best imo.

atsonicpark · 05.05.2009, 07:14 PM

The 3rd matrix film is probably the worst film I've ever seen. The 2nd one is bad except for the freeway scene.

Dr. Eugene Felikson · 05.05.2009, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark

The 3rd matrix film is probably the worst film I've ever seen. The 2nd one is bad except for the freeway scene.

I couldn't agree more.

davenotdead · 05.05.2009, 07:38 PM

agreed thirded

floatingslowly · 05.05.2009, 07:38 PM

^^^(x3) this is completely unexpected news!

Dr. Eugene Felikson · 05.05.2009, 07:40 PM

Inland Empire is too self-indulgent, even for Lynch. I still really liked it, but Lynch should've tightened things up a bit more in the editing room.

joe11121 · 05.05.2009, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atsonicpark

The 3rd matrix film is probably the worst film I've ever seen. The 2nd one is bad except for the freeway scene.

Haha. I've never seen any Matrix movie. They don't sound too good.

atsonicpark · 05.05.2009, 07:48 PM

Yeah, what bothers me is that there's nothing going on it. Most Lynch films have layers of dialogue, things happening in the background (literally and.. uh.. metaphorically I guess). Lynch shot with no script. There's been conflicting reports about this, but in 3 interviews he said he had no finished script, and many scenes were written on handkerchiefs or post-it notes the night before shooting. This shows, because it just never really adds up to much. It's an overly simple story, stretched out beyond belief. Some great performances, but it's missing all the things I love about Lynch. There's almost no humor, it's actually boring at times (a sad Lynch first), no Badalamenti... that scene with that Beck song playing is embarassing! Also, it looks like shit, the best scenes (the rabbits stuff) is reused from.. uh.. Rabbits. Lynch's films kept getting longer and longer when he was using film; with DV, he could be as indulgent as he wanted. He shot something like 60 hours for Inland Empire. Just ridiculous. Oh, there's a shaky camera at times, another Lynch first. The whole film is just a big ugly dinosaur.

There's lots to love about it though. GReat atmosphere, great stilted/awkward performances, and like I said.. it really sticks with ya.

05.05.2009, 12:03 PM	#6261
LifeDistortion expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CA Posts: 2,457	"The Science of Sleep" is a good movie but wanted to love it and only liked it. It had a great trailer.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 12:04 PM	#6262
LifeDistortion expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CA Posts: 2,457	Thinking of seeing Zombie's "Halloween" to see how much he fucked it up.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 03:32 PM	#6265
nicfit invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: banana boat Posts: 15,570	the bank job. kind of a letdown. __________________ 11:11 11-11-11 I Ascended.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 03:39 PM	#6266
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Yeah, it's pretty boring isn't it? You figured Statham would say FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK and kill everyone. Instead it's one of the most boring heist films I've ever seen. Yawn. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 03:51 PM	#6267
nicfit invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: banana boat Posts: 15,570	Yes. Not well written at all, even the "mood" is somehow wrong...I'm waiting for Crank 2 ha ha. __________________ 11:11 11-11-11 I Ascended.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 05:07 PM	#6271
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Yeah, definitely a lesser work. Nothing really happens in it. I've watched it 4 1/2 times... it definitely sticks with you. It's something you probably need to watch once. You'll always think about it... but... really, a good hour could have been cut from it... it's just a bit all over the place. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 06:42 PM	#6272
floatingslowly invito al cielo Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 21,165	netflix to xbox streams of the last two matrix movies since I've never bothered to watch anything past the first one. LIEKS: the machines didn't really lose. I LIEK KUNGFU IS GUD. more "real" world. less "matrix" kungfu. powersuited terminator marines. (and by terminator, I mean, WH40K). I RLY LIEK THE VIRUS MR SMITH. DISLIEKS: girlgun doing the "ted air-guitar thing", in front of the TV, while I was trying to watch. watching with my kid and having to explain every gawd damn thing (when I'm not sure even the writers knew WTF). seeing that "ted air-guitar thing" everytime neo wanted to kungfu the agents. all the fucking mr. smiths at the end; they would smile at each other and it made me want to kungfu.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 07:14 PM	#6274
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	The 3rd matrix film is probably the worst film I've ever seen. The 2nd one is bad except for the freeway scene. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 07:38 PM	#6276
davenotdead invito al cielo Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 7,784	agreed thirded __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 07:38 PM	#6277
floatingslowly invito al cielo Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 21,165	^^^(x3) this is completely unexpected news!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 07:40 PM	#6278
Dr. Eugene Felikson invito al cielo Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 7,571	Inland Empire is too self-indulgent, even for Lynch. I still really liked it, but Lynch should've tightened things up a bit more in the editing room.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

05.05.2009, 07:48 PM	#6280
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Yeah, what bothers me is that there's nothing going on it. Most Lynch films have layers of dialogue, things happening in the background (literally and.. uh.. metaphorically I guess). Lynch shot with no script. There's been conflicting reports about this, but in 3 interviews he said he had no finished script, and many scenes were written on handkerchiefs or post-it notes the night before shooting. This shows, because it just never really adds up to much. It's an overly simple story, stretched out beyond belief. Some great performances, but it's missing all the things I love about Lynch. There's almost no humor, it's actually boring at times (a sad Lynch first), no Badalamenti... that scene with that Beck song playing is embarassing! Also, it looks like shit, the best scenes (the rabbits stuff) is reused from.. uh.. Rabbits. Lynch's films kept getting longer and longer when he was using film; with DV, he could be as indulgent as he wanted. He shot something like 60 hours for Inland Empire. Just ridiculous. Oh, there's a shaky camera at times, another Lynch first. The whole film is just a big ugly dinosaur. There's lots to love about it though. GReat atmosphere, great stilted/awkward performances, and like I said.. it really sticks with ya. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|