[Genteel Death]

Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels

I read an article once about a man who is sexually around by cars and he liked to have sex with the exhaust pipe, but that doesn't mean that autotrader is a porno mag just because somebody can manage to jerk off to it, regardless of their social background.

Anyway, it's one of those vague art questions about where you draw the line....I'll have to think about this later, or I'll be late for dinner with the mother of someone you think is awesome.

And also, just because some paeadophiles jerk off to pictures of naked babies it doesn't mean that the babies' nudity is pornography. I think that if you're easily aroused by nudity in contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose you ought to question your attitudes towards sex and your own sex life in general.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Genteel Death

And also, just because some paeadophiles jerk off to pictures of naked babies it doesn't mean that the babies' nudity is pornography.

right, pedophiles ruined baby photography for all.

Originally Posted by Genteel Death

I think that if you're easily aroused by nudity in contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose you ought to question your attitudes towards sex and your own sex life in general.

the thing is though, contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose are hard to come by these days.

as for me, i'll say this: when i see the picture of a very beautiful woman (e.g., that one i posted above) what i often get is not a boner but a lump in the throat. what does that mean? i don't fucking know, but i hope it's not cancer.

Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels

I read an article once about a man who is sexually around by cars and he liked to have sex with the exhaust pipe, but that doesn't mean that autotrader is a porno mag just because somebody can manage to jerk off to it, regardless of their social background.

Anyway, it's one of those vague art questions about where you draw the line....I'll have to think about this later, or I'll be late for dinner with the mother of someone you think is awesome.

the thing with kern is that he walks right on that line and you could legitimately say he makes porn and he is an artist and be correct on both counts. kern himself has said repeatedly he makes porn for rich people and while he might mean it ironically one could also take his words at face value. besides, porn and art have been together for milennia. i think ultimately pornographers are just terrible artists, with rare exceptions like just jaecquin or kern himself.

im rambling on a bad internet connection in a non-air-conditioned room at midday. probably makes for bad reasoning.

anyway, have fun.

[Genteel Death]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

right, pedophiles ruined baby photography for all.

the thing is though, contexts that obviously serve an artistic purpose are hard to come by these days.

as for me, i'll say this: when i see the picture of a very beautiful woman (e.g., that one i posted above) what i often get is not a boner but a lump in the throat. what does that mean? i don't fucking know, but i hope it's not cancer.



the thing with kern is that he walks right on that line and you could legitimately say he makes porn and he is an artist and be correct on both counts. kern himself has said repeatedly he makes porn for rich people and while he might mean it ironically one could also take his words at face value. besides, porn and art have been together for milennia. i think ultimately pornographers are just terrible artists, with rare exceptions like just jaecquin or kern himself.

im rambling on a bad internet connection in a non-air-conditioned room at midday. probably makes for bad reasoning.

anyway, have fun.

Paedophiles only taint the enjoyment you'll feel by watching kids clumsily undress themselves if you are already a person attracted to them in a sexual way. Context in art is something that isn't as demanded as before but it's there and only waiting for a roll call. I don't think there is a lack of it, it's just much harder work to explain it because distraction and whinging seem to dominate the modus operandi of human interaction for most people these days. My foot hurts, my dog hurts, something hurts not too far away for me.

[Genteel Death]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

the thing with kern is that he walks right on that line and you could legitimately say he makes porn and he is an artist and be correct on both counts. kern himself has said repeatedly he makes porn for rich people and while he might mean it ironically one could also take his words at face value. besides, porn and art have been together for milennia. i think ultimately pornographers are just terrible artists, with rare exceptions like just jaecquin or kern himself.

im rambling on a bad internet connection in a non-air-conditioned room at midday. probably makes for bad reasoning.

anyway, have fun.

Finally. I LOVE RICHARD KERN! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caqxHral2iY

[dead_battery]

if a man works hard all day he can do what he wants to, at night...

[dead_battery]

heaven forbid, I remain chaste and restrained for my heart is pledged to the LORD.

[dale_gribble]

 

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Genteel Death

Paedophiles only taint the enjoyment you'll feel by watching kids clumsily undress themselves if you are already a person attracted to them in a sexual way. Context in art is something that isn't as demanded as before but it's there and only waiting for a roll call. I don't think there is a lack of it, it's just much harder work to explain it because distraction and whinging seem to dominate the modus operandi of human interaction for most people these days. My foot hurts, my dog hurts, something hurts not too far away for me.

hm, don't forget everyone is fucking "offended"

must not offend

anyway som time ago i can't remember when we're watching some french movie i don't remember so well but there's this naked toddler jumping about and it's sort of hilarious but then i say "this movie no fucking way in hell could have been made in america" (because of little baby weewee is likely "pornography" here and naked babies must wear at least loincloth).

which brings to mind that like a decade ago (or more?) an afghan man in the yooessey was accused of child abuse because he followed his native custom of kissing (a peck, mind you, not some slurpee mess) his newborn's tiny family sceptre (which is i read some sort of homage to the patrilinieal heritage of such primitives). but anyway. i thought it was bizarre that he gets accused of a crime while he was acting in complete innocence.

anyway i was reminded of this because i rewatched "the tit and the moon" the other day and there it is again, a boy going at a nipple hard (the lucky bastard, two nipples actually). and it's a lovely, beautiful movie. but you know, in america tits are porno but machine gun massacres with 3D explosions are good and wholesome family entertainment.

anyway, since ythis is the thread for beautiful women, here are two:

 

[Torn Curtain]

Originally Posted by dale_gribble

 

Who is it ?

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels

This board's interestingness has always been cyclical around the appearance of cool girls who eventually get pissed off with the creeps/bros and leave.

Years ago, probably 7 or 8 years ago, when I was more interested in this place and it was busier, I thought about creating a female alter ego here and posting for a while, just long enough to see who would start PMing me creepy stuff, or whatever, and then making a thread of screen grabs of creepy PMs. I kind of regret not doing it.

You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later.

I tried to spread it around like crazy to be able to rep you on this, but I got blocked..

[Bytor Peltor]

Originally Posted by Toilet & Bowels

Who is that?

I believe it's, Sasha Grey:

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Sasha+Grey

http://vimeo.com/13764968

[Pinkunicornnx]

Originally Posted by foreverasskiss

 

 

That chick is a bit fat tbh:/

[SuchFriendsAreDangerous]

Originally Posted by Pinkunicornnx

That chick is a bit fat tbh:/

 

that is not fair, fat is a relative term, most men with any warm blood would call that thick. however and again, I do not support this thread, but even less support dissing otherwise attractive women with more cushion than some folks like. its a free world, thick chicks will rock your world AND take excellent care of you. top model chicks? Pain in the a$$, like Game said,

 

Oh that top model chick shes for the diamond lane

[Pinkunicornnx]

Originally Posted by foreverasskiss

if you say so. you're out of yr mind. she's lovely, beautiful and everything in between. she makes me tingle all over.

what's wrong with you?

Yeah, that was just my point of view... Anyway... I'm a straight female so I guess it's normal that I'm not attracted to her

[dale_gribble]

Originally Posted by Torn Curtain

Who is it ?

teri gender bender from le butcherettes

[Rob Instigator]

New director at Baltimore's Contemporary Museum of art, Deana Haggag.

http://strangerswithstyle.files.word...h49.jpg?w=1365

 

 

 

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Pinkunicornnx

That chick is a bit fat tbh:/

and this is a problem for you because....???

[Rob Instigator]

guys with tiny thin pencil dicks can't handle the bigger girls.

[!@#$%!]

i'm thinking calling one's self "pink unicorn" might be a way to overcompensate.

[Savage Clone]

London Andrews is gorgeous.
Fuck weight-shaming.