[Savage Clone]

I honestly just tried and it came up blank. doesn't totally matter though. I'm not going to be contributing to this thread anymore anyway. Have fun.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Savage Clone

I honestly just tried and it came up blank. doesn't totally matter though. I'm not going to be contributing to this thread anymore anyway. Have fun.

his bullshit is incomprehensible drivel and nobody here blames you

[!@#$%!]

drunkle bob is chugging squeezins

[Savage Clone]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

It's still searchable to me! It sounds to me as if you're admitting the fact that you've lost your argument, and you're running away with your tail between your legs.

Buh bye!

there's no way to prove to you that technology isn't working the same way for both of us but I'm not here to win the thread so have fun. I honestly don't care. You're not going to change my mind and I'm not going to change yours so have fun in your pitiful little world. It makes no difference to me.

[!@#$%!]

Senate committee unanimously endorses spy agencies’ finding that Russia interfered in 2016 presidential race in bid to help Trump

By
Ellen Nakashima
April 21, 2020 at 11:49 a.m. MDT

The Senate Intelligence Committee has unanimously endorsed the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia conducted a sweeping and unprecedented campaign to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

The heavily-redacted report, based on a three-year investigation, builds on a committee finding nearly two years ago that the January 2017 intelligence community assessment (ICA) on Russia was sound. The spy agencies also found that Russia sought to shake faith in American democracy, denigrate then-candidate Hillary Clinton and boost her rival Donald Trump.

The report, while not unexpected, is nonetheless a milestone — the first extensive bipartisan congressional affirmation of the intelligence agencies’ conclusion, which continues to be at odds with President Trump’s oft-stated doubts about Russia’s role in the 2016 race.

“ The committee found no reason to dispute the intelligence community’s conclusions,” Chairman Richard Burr (R-N.C.) said in a statement.
“The ICA summarizing intelligence concerning the 2016 election represented the kind of unbiased and professional work we expect and require” from the agencies, Vice-Chairman Mark R. Warner (D-Va.) said. “The ICA correctly found the Russians interfered in our 2016 election to hurt Secretary Clinton and help the candidacy of Donald Trump. Our review of the highly classified ICA and underlying intelligence found that this and other conclusions were well-supported.”
The committee said the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI — coordinated by the Director of National Intelligence — presented a “coherent and well-constructed” case for their assessment, supported by intelligence from human and electronic sources.

Significantly, the committee said, “interviews with those who drafted and prepared the ICA affirmed that analysts were under no political pressure to reach specific conclusions.”

etc etc here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...7c7_story.html

[!@#$%!]

drunkle bob is talking to his listerine bottle

[Skuj]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

Senate committee unanimously endorses spy agencies’ finding that Russia interfered in 2016 presidential race in bid to help Trump

FAKE NEWS!! IT'S ALL FAKE I TELL YOU!!!

[Skuj]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

Huh?

The Müller Committee refuted that charge.

Wait...wtf are you smoking? Seriously?

[Skuj]

Fuck it. Skunk is on my ignore also. He/she is even more deluded than Byteme.

(Symbols, why do you have Byteme on ignore, but not Skunk?)

UNFUCKINGBELIEVEABLE that Skunk is pushing this notion that Mueller refuted the 2016 Russian intereference charge. That report was mostly about that very subject. I have the fucking book on my shelf. Fuck me.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Skuj

Wait...wtf are you smoking? Seriously?

he drinks drano

pay him no mind

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by Skuj

Fuck it. Skunk is on my ignore also. He/she is even more deluded than Byteme.

(Symbols, why do you have Byteme on ignore, but not Skunk?)

UNFUCKINGBELIEVEABLE that Skunk is pushing this notion that Mueller refuted the 2016 Russian intereference charge. That report was mostly about that very subject. I have the fucking book on my shelf. Fuck me.

i have both the skunk and the toad on ignore, and read them only when someone quotes them

[Skuj]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i have both the skunk and the toad on ignore, and read them only when someone quotes them

There should be a law against that.

Seriously....Skunk actually thinks that Mueller refuted 2016 Russian interference!! You cannot make this shit up.

[Skuj]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

Mueller Report, vol. I, p. 173: "Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities."

I didn't get around to deleting you yet.

See the part that I bolded?

The whole fucking report details how Russia interfered. You should look at it sometime!!

Fucking, where is that ignore option again...I cannot deal with these ignoramuses.

[choc e-Claire]

You absolute fucking moron. Just because the Trump campaign didn't reach out to Russia doesn't mean Russia didn't try to help them.

[choc e-Claire]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

You absolute high school kid!

lol, the one time I manage to avoid the ageist insults.

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

Just because Trump didn't reach out to Russia, and just because the Trump campaign didn't respond to Russia's attempt to reach out to them...

...doesn't mean that they didn't benefit from it!
Here's an analogy that you can (probably) understand. Say you're trying to move a pile of bricks that belong to someone else (say, from a wheelbarrow to their garage). You ask them for help, and they ignore you. Do you still move the bricks?
Now replace "move the bricks" with "interfere with elections" and you've got what we've been railing against for the last three and a half years. Alternatively, replace "bricks" with "brains" and we've got what you've seemed to have.

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

And I've already laid out grounds for doubting the efficacy of any Russian interference on my President's behalf during his 2016 election campaign.

I've already laid my grounds out for thinking you're an idiot and an asshole.

[choc e-Claire]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

[bla bla bla, etc. etc. here

Yeah - no collusion =/= no interference, something that you seem all too happy with.

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

the English-speaking world (is Australia still one of us?)

Oh, whatever could this mean?

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by choc e-Claire

Yeah - no collusion =/= no interference, something that you seem all too happy with.


Oh, whatever could this mean?

haaahaaahaaaahaaaa

the best way to deal with that lonely old drunkard is to starve him of attention... but your posts crack me up, A+++

[The Soup Nazi]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

 

Originally Posted by Skuj

Would you laugh if I told you that I agree with every single one of those CNN banners?

There's not much to agree with, really, because they're not opinions, they're evident facts. But —and I say this days after that/those specific briefings happened; I don't know whether CNN has changed its M.O. because I have no cable DAMMIT I'M TIRED OF BEING POOR— the network is trying to have its Dotard and shit on him too. Fucker deserves a lot more shit than this, actually, but ultimately it's only propaganda if you broadcast it. Have integrity, take the ratings hit, put on something else like an episode of the late great Anthony Bourdain's program, and book Fauci to speak to Anderson Cooper later.

[Skuj]

Originally Posted by choc e-Claire

You absolute fucking moron. Just because the Trump campaign didn't reach out to Russia doesn't mean Russia didn't try to help them.

I don't know what Skunk is posting anymore, nor do I care, but to be clear, he initially said that "the Mueller committe refuted that charge" when quoting this:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
Senate committee unanimously endorses spy agencies’ finding that Russia interfered in 2016 presidential race in bid to help Trump

I know that putting these morons on ignore makes me a person who is not interested in "the other side's point of view", but there are limits. I just cannot fucking deal with people who wilfully overlook inconvenient facts, just because Dear Leader cries that it was all fake and witchuntery.

[Skuj]

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcar...ng-funding-for

Poor guy. He got the sharpie treatment. The tentacles of today's anti-truth, anti-science GOP are very long indeed.