06.25.2020, 08:34 AM | #8301 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,148
|
it's probably been said somewhere in this thread already, but i'll repeat that people are wanting to "return to normal" but there is no normal like we previously had. Probably what should be getting said is "return back to familiar" which also probably won't happen and probably shouldn't either.
__________________
Shake shake |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.25.2020, 10:50 PM | #8302 | |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ttQIkTEDRo *if you ask me, the US' peak was the moon landing, and it's been downhill ever since
__________________
https://handinthefates.bandcamp.com<--music |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.26.2020, 12:58 AM | #8303 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlen, Texas
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
I hope something close to this is true : ) |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.26.2020, 02:28 AM | #8304 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlen, Texas
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
Newly released notes from Peter Strzok and the FBI CONFIRM the Obama Administration’s PLOT to take down the Trump Administration and General Flynn Handwritten notes from fired former FBI agent Peter Strzok show that Obama himself directed key aspects of the campaign to target Flynn during a Jan. 5, 2017 meeting in the Oval Office. Peter Strzok's Notes Confirm President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden PERSONALLY ORDERED Hit On Michael Flynn NSA-D-DAG = [Flynn cuts?]. Other countries D-DAG: lean forward on [unclass?] VP: “Logan Act” P: These are unusual times VP: I’ve been on the intel cmte for ten years and I never P: Make sure you look at things + have the right people on it P: Is there anything I shouldn’t be telling transition team? D: Flynn –> Kislyak calls but appear legit [illegible] Happy New Year. Yeah right May 2020 George Stephanopoulos: “what did you know of those moves to investigate Michael Flynn and was there anything improper done?” Joe Biden: “I know nothing about those moves to investigate Michael Flynn number 1......number 2 this is all about diversion, this is the game this guy plays all the time, the country is in crisis” Why would Joe Biden lie on Good Morning America? (same video as above at 1:11) George Stephanopoulos: “I want to press this point, you say you don’t know anything about it but you were reported to be at a January 5th, 2017 meeting where you and the President were briefed on the FBI’s plan to question Michael Flynn over those questions he had with Russian Ambassador Kislysk.” Joe Biden: “no I thought you asked me weather or not if I had anything to do with him being prosecuted, I’m sorry, I was aware that they asked for an investigation, but that’s all I know about it...ummm...think about this, can you imagine any other President of the United States focusing on this at the moment when the country is absolutely concerned about its health.” Again, why would Joe Biden lie when he knows he is the very one to suggest The Logan Act as a way to TARGET Michael Flynn AFTER the FBI investigation revealed everything Flynn was doing was appropriate??? Also, then Vice President Joe Biden PERSONALLY issued a unmasking request just days before leaving office......why??? |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.26.2020, 02:58 AM | #8305 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlen, Texas
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
Mr. Schunk is bringing the truth! Sadly, many here at SYG can’t handle the truth!! More importantly, those young people that are rising up and marching for justice and have no clue about history, these are the same individuals who will choose to NOT stand in line and vote come November!!! |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.28.2020, 02:00 AM | #8306 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
|
Reports are coming out that supposedly Trump knew about Russia paying the Taliban a bounty to kill American troops. Obviously the white house has denied all this happening, but then you realise how much he's done to shit on American troops you gotta wonder that it might be true. Have a brief look atwhat everyone's favourite draft dodger has done....
Quote:
__________________
Down with this sort of thing. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.28.2020, 02:02 AM | #8307 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
__________________
Down with this sort of thing. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.28.2020, 05:37 AM | #8308 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
|
Gotta love to see it
__________________
Down with this sort of thing. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.28.2020, 08:19 PM | #8309 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 18,243
|
__________________
GADJI BERI BIMBA GLANDRIDI LAULI LONNI CADORI GADJAM A BIM BERI GLASSALA GLANDRIDI E GLASSALA TUFFM I ZIMBRA |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.28.2020, 11:50 PM | #8310 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 18,243
|
They're pretty stable geniuses.
__________________
GADJI BERI BIMBA GLANDRIDI LAULI LONNI CADORI GADJAM A BIM BERI GLASSALA GLANDRIDI E GLASSALA TUFFM I ZIMBRA |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.29.2020, 12:06 AM | #8311 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlen, Texas
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
YES - Flynn Judge Ordered To Drop Case!!! Michael Flynn was seeking a writ of mandamus from the District Court and it was granted. In a 2-1 decision, Judge Emmet Sullivan was ordered to dismiss the case! From The Motion To Dismiss “After a considered review of all the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information appended to the defendant’s supplemental pleadings, ECF Nos. 181, 188-190,1 the Government has concluded that the interview of Mr. Flynn was untethered to, and unjustified by, the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into Mr. Flynn—a no longer justifiably predicated investigation that the FBI had, in the Bureau’s own words, prepared to close because it had yielded an “absence of any derogatory information.” Ex. 1 at 4, FBI FD-1057 “Closing Communication” Jan. 4, 2017 (emphases added). The Government is not persuaded that the January 24, 2017 interview was conducted with a legitimate investigative basis and therefore does not believe Mr. Flynn’s statements were material even if untrue. Moreover, we not believe that the Government can prove either the relevant false statements or their materiality beyond a reasonable doubt.“ Remember, In December 2016 FBI agents moved to close an investigation on Flynn after finding no evidence of wrongdoing, but former FBI Intelligence Agent Peter Strzok demanded it be kept open. At the time, Strzok cited senior officials as the reason why. On January 5, 2017, President Obama held a meeting in the Oval Office and asked whether Flynn should be "treated differently." Weeks later, FBI agents showed up at the White House to interview Flynn and handwritten notes state, “What's our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?" Will the free-minded-freethinkers ever call out President Barack Hussein Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Hillary Rodam Clinton for their traitorous activities against American citizens? Using their positions of power to try and overturn an election? Spending 30 million+ on the Mueller investigation and wasting America’s time and money on Impeachment Hearings that combined ended up producing NOTHING-NADA-ZILCH!!! |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.29.2020, 02:42 AM | #8312 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlen, Texas
Posts: 3,784
|
Quote:
No. 20-5143 IN RE: MICHAEL T. FLYNN, PETITIONER Mr. Schunk, how rare was it that the court took the case and was it even more rare they granted the Writ of mandamus? Michael Flynn was seeking THREE forms of relief: 1) an order directing the district court to grant the motion to dismiss; 2) an order vacating the amicus appointment; 3) an order reassigning the case to a different district judge Relief was granted for orders 1 and 2......by granting 1, 3 no longer needed a ruling? By ordering the dismissal, was the Appeals Court saying the lower court didn’t have the authority to: A. deny the motion to dismiss B. appointed amicus curiae I don’t have a clue concerning Rule 48, but this doesn’t sound promising for Judge Sullivan’s actions: “Rule 48 motions must be granted “in the overwhelming number of cases”). More specifically, “[t]he principal object of the ‘leave of court’ requirement is ... to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment“ “Rule 48 thus “gives no power to a district court to deny a prosecutor’s ... motion to dismiss charges based on a disagreement with the prosecution’s exercise of charging authority.” And the Judge’s didn’t appear happy with “The first troubling indication of the district court’s mistaken understanding of its role in ruling on an unopposed Rule 48(a) motion was the appointment of John Gleeson to “present arguments in opposition to the government’s Motion.” Order Appointing Amicus Curiae, that role does not include designating an advocate to defend Flynn’s continued prosecution.” This is my favorite part “The district court’s order put two “coequal branches of the Government ... on a collision course“ |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.29.2020, 08:08 AM | #8313 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
Speaking of traitors, not think that it's a pretty horrific thing that Russia offered bounties to the Taliban for the deaths of American soldiers? On top of that do you not think it's pretty horrific that the white house, and Trump especially, turned a blind eye. That seems like a pretty big traitorous move. I mean, I'm guessing that you ignoring my original post shows either that you've got your head in the sand about it, or you're trying to work out how to say that it's all lie and #fakenews yada-yada-yah. As it is, I already linked about how the Obama/Flynn debacle (not that you read it, like) is nothing more the a right wing kerfuffle that has no evidence. I mean, the fact that the loudest foghorn, trump, doesn't even know what he's shouting about should tell you everything. Because I'm nice. Here it is again.
__________________
Down with this sort of thing. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.29.2020, 03:36 PM | #8314 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mars attacks
Posts: 42,564
|
trump: russia first!
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
06.30.2020, 11:21 PM | #8315 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,666
|
Today I copied a handwritten letter for a customer that talked about a "liberal socialist dictatorship power-grab" and if you aren't voting for Trump in November, don't vote at all.
Some people in this country (and this thread) are going to need some serious deprogramming when Trump is done.
__________________
https://handinthefates.bandcamp.com<--music |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.01.2020, 01:46 AM | #8316 |
expwy. to yr skull
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 2,148
|
I'm still highly irritated by anyone claiming not voting is a vote for the person they oppose. NO IT'S NOT. What If I was going to vote for them IF I DID vote? Me staying home actually helps YOUR CANDIDATE because it's 1 less vote to surmount. Now, I know it would help MORE if I voted for your candidate, BUT me not voting doesn't automatically hurt that candidate.
I'm almost to the point where I'm willing to lie to everyone and get who they voted for and claim I voted for either the opposite, or voted the way they did, depending on my mood at the given moment, and how how much I valued their friendship. I dunno. I will absolutely admit that I am a registered republican at the present time, who has never actually voted for a republican POTUS candidate in November. Way back in high school, circa 2001-2002 or so, they helped us register, I chose Independent, I wasn't paying attention at the time, though the party I chose could reflect otherwise. I switched to republican for either the 2012 or 2016 primaries, I forget which. I need to re-change back to Independent. At present time, I'm not sure if I'm going to vote Democrat or vote Libertarian. I'm in the who gives a fuck state of South Dakota, as some of you may recall from past posts. As I recall, 2016 democrat and Independent voting stats didn't add up anywhere close to Trump's numbers, so it was again a who fucking cares how I voted case, there wasn't the combined numbers. That said, 2020 happened, and it's be a what the fuck year, who knows what will actually happen. Thus I haven't committed to one party or the other, but I'll be damned and may any deity you believe in strike me down with thunder and death succeeding corona if I'm voting for Trump in 2020. Dude is getting the biggest blowjob in history from the GOP, but I refuse to actually contribute to him getting a 4 more years longer blowjob from his yes people.
__________________
Shake shake |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.01.2020, 02:08 AM | #8317 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 18,243
|
Quote:
The derangedness is gonna stay there. Remember the Teabaggers? Birthers? Churchers? It all happened under Barack Obama's presidency. They couldn't stand seeing a black man in charge, they were told that's not how you overcome a brutal recession, that your granny was gonna have to go after the "death panels" gave her the thumbs-down... Look, the Republican credo —"small government", magical tax cuts, imaginary friends— is one thing. WHY MUST THAT MEAN SUPPORTING A MONSTER LIKE TRUMP. Why is it so hard to say, yes, I'm a Republican, I believe Reagan's bullshit, but I won't stand for an egregriously racist, misogynistic, authoritarian, treasonous, willfully ignorant turd of a person who governs by tweet and says/does a crazy fucked-up thing daily/hourly to stay in the news loop? The two or three people in this board who vocally (and passionately, as it turns out) back him are gone, there's no deprogramming possible.
__________________
GADJI BERI BIMBA GLANDRIDI LAULI LONNI CADORI GADJAM A BIM BERI GLASSALA GLANDRIDI E GLASSALA TUFFM I ZIMBRA |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.01.2020, 03:50 AM | #8318 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Mulder's Basement room
Posts: 5,459
|
Quote:
Don't be counting your chickens just yet. There's more than a fair share of people who will vote for him no matter what.
__________________
Down with this sort of thing. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.01.2020, 11:03 AM | #8319 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 18,243
|
Quote:
Old maid We're not getting any younger So wait You can count your chickens When you get laid Glenn Kotche's least favorite Wilco song.
__________________
GADJI BERI BIMBA GLANDRIDI LAULI LONNI CADORI GADJAM A BIM BERI GLASSALA GLANDRIDI E GLASSALA TUFFM I ZIMBRA |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
07.01.2020, 11:05 AM | #8320 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 18,243
|
https://43alumniforjoebiden.com/
Yeah, but I want NAMES (besides Colin Powell). Otherwise this is a pretty tame endorsement.
__________________
GADJI BERI BIMBA GLANDRIDI LAULI LONNI CADORI GADJAM A BIM BERI GLASSALA GLANDRIDI E GLASSALA TUFFM I ZIMBRA |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |