[!@#$%!]

i bet beauregard posted something sickening

[h8kurdt]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i bet beauregard posted something sickening

Ah, it's just him defending Trump's current best friend Barr.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by h8kurdt

Ah, it's just him defending Trump's current best friend Barr.

just as expected

[Bytor Peltor]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

Attorney General Barr: BOGUS “Russiagate” Scandal

Attorney General William P. Barr Before the House Judiciary Committee
Washington, DC ~ Tuesday, July 28, 2020

”Ever since I made it clear that I was going to do everything I could to get to the bottom of the grave abuses involved in the bogus “Russiagate” scandal, many of the Democrats on this Committee have attempted to discredit me by conjuring up a narrative that I am simply the President’s factotum who disposes of criminal cases according to his instructions. Judging from the letter inviting me to this hearing, that appears to be your agenda today.“

Jim Jordan: so Mr. Durham is looking at how the whole Trump-Russia thing started. You have another US attorney, can you give us that attorneys name?

Bill Barr: John Bash of Texas

JJ: John Bash of Texas is looking specifically at the fact
BB: at unmasking

Jim Jordan: 38 people, 49 times unmasked Michael Flynn‘s name and probably other unmasking that took place in the final days of the Obama/Biden administration...is that accurate?

Bill Barr: actually a much longer period of time

JJ: even before that?
BB: yes

[h8kurdt]

"With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???"

Trump shitting himself cos he's realised there's a good chance he might lose the election. Imagine if Obama had suggested the same under similar circumstances.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by h8kurdt

"With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???"

Trump shitting himself cos he's realised there's a good chance he might lose the election. Imagine if Obama had suggested the same under similar circumstances.

besides the obvious failure and attempted power grab, he’s also trying to distract from today’s economic figures:

the economy’s worst quarter in 145 years: a 9.5% contraction in just 3 months (32.9% annualized but we’re not there yet... maybe?)

#stablegenius (and the incurable imbeciles who still support him)

first he bankupted a casino, then he bankrupted us.

[Bytor Peltor]

As we hit the final day of July, I thought this would be a good time to reflect on what has transpired. Just this week Attorney General William Barr testified before Congress that the Department of Justice has multiple investigations into spying and unmasking by the Obama Administration and wether this should lead to criminal charges.

It was the final week of July 2019 when Robbert Mueller testified before Congress proclaiming that he didn’t use the word —collusion— because it’s not a legal term!

Page 203 May 2018

Originally Posted by Skuj

And so it goes....on and on and on and on.....in circles.

If Mueller does end his investigation with charges of collusion, I don't know how in the fuck Peltor and millions of others are going to comprehend it. Symbols said it best a few posts ago. We are in the age of Alternative Facts.

Originally Posted by Skuj

I will be shocked if Mueller doesn't find collusion, based on everything we know about charges and where the investigation is going.

When Trump spews "no collusion" 20 times a day, it actually works on millions, doesn't it? Nevermind that we can prove that he has lied on numerous occasions.

This is all a bad dream.

Originally Posted by Skuj

Tesla, even if I buy that (not sure where it came from...link please?) and say that Clinton is evil and corrupt etc etc, how does that nullify / answer what I previously stated?

It's always "Clinton this, Clinton that....what about Clinton?", but last time I checked, she is not the current occupant of the White House.

Originally Posted by Skuj

So, now it appears that an FBI "spy" was embedded in the Trump campaign, and Team Trump wants to expose the person for political reasons.

Maybe I'm not very smart at times, but didn't a whole lot of legal steps have to be taken in order for that person to be there? Shouldn't Trump be worried about WHY that person was there instead of playing cheap politics once again?

And while some of you here didn’t understand that collusion wasn’t illegal, conspiracy is illegal and I have NO DOUBTS Attorney General Barr’s investigators will prove that Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton actively participated in the unmasking and spying against General Flynn and the Donald Trump campaign!


Page 304 February 2019

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

"If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don't have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia”


”The entire affair will end in silence from Special Councel Robert Muller”

It’s important to remember that Hillary Clinton paid for the fake dossier and that information was used to perpetrate fraud upon the FISA court and of course that led to the Mueller investigation.


Page 366 July 2019

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

“Can you give me an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined that an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?”

Mueller could not provide an answer!

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

100% correct!

Mueller (or any investigator) is never responsible for finding someone innocent. They are charged to find evidence that can be used to prove guilt, and that is all!

I mentioned this multiple times last year. I also mentioned numerous times that collusion isn’t illegal......but conspiracy is......Mueller found nada!

Nada = ZERO obstruction, conspiracy, or collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia!!!

The reason I posted the question and non answer, Mueller eventually mentioned “unusual circumstances” and the person asking the question asked if there was guidelines / rules that deal with special circumstances......Mueller didn’t produce any.

Mueller came across as a sad old man. It was as if the only person to learn anything from the Mueller report today was Bob.

Those with logic realize this investigation was based on a unverified dossier paid for by Hillary Clinton and conducted by politically-biased prosecutors!!!

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

Bret Baier: "Democrats today are no closer to impeachment than yesterday."

Trey Gowdy: "Ah no they're not closer to anything other than wishing this had never happened. This hearing was an abject MISERABLE FAILURE!"

President Donald Trump: “the Democrats had nothing, now they have less than nothing”


Michael Moore: “A frail old man, unable to remember things, stumbling, refusing to answer basic questions...I said it in 2017 and Mueller confirmed it today — All you pundits and moderates and lame Dems who told the public to put their faith in the esteemed Robert Mueller — just STFU from now on”

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

I thought it was a brilliant question, but I do apologize for posting the partial snippet earlier......but it’s easy to find the logic if you know what you are looking for:

Ratcliffe, R-Texas, asked Mueller during congressional testimony to identify which Justice Department policy “set forth a legal standard that an investigated person is not exonerated if their innocence from criminal conduct is not conclusively determined.” The lawmaker was raising concern about Mueller's report saying that while the probe did not establish Trump committed a crime, it also did not exonerate him.

“Can you give an example other than Donald Trump where the Justice Department determined an investigated person was not exonerated because their innocence was not conclusively determined?” Ratcliffe continued.

Mueller replied: “I cannot but this is a unique situation."

Ratcliffe continued: “Okay, well you can't--time is short, I got five minutes, let's leave it at you can't find it because--I'll tell you why, it doesn't exist."

“The special counsel’s job didn’t say you were to determine Trump’s innocence or to exonerate him,” Ratcliffe said. “It’s not in documents, it’s not in the Office of Legal Counsel opinion, any justice manual…Respectfully it was not the special counsel’s job to conclusively determine Trump’s innocence.”

He added: “because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence—everyone is entitled to it, including a sitting president, and because of a presumption of innocence, a prosecutor never, ever needs to determine it. ... You wrote 180 pages about decisions that weren’t reached, about potential crimes that weren’t charged or decided.”

He contended that the obstruction section of the report “was not authorized under the law to be written—it was written under a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department.”

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

Former Federal Prosecutor on Mueller: 'He Clearly Did Not Run This Investigation'

Take a look at the last quote: Former Federal Prosecutor on Mueller: 'He Clearly Did Not Run This Investigation'.”

Over two years and $30+ million dollars wasted because Barak Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and the FBI wanted to fabricate a Trump-Russia narrative that many of the free minded freethinkers here at SYG swallowed hook line and sinker.

TALK ABOUT CONSPIRACY!!!

Someone tell Skuj to pull his head out of the sand and everyone pop some popcorn because this Wednesday, August 5th, Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee and it’s going to be epic......everyone have a great weekend!!!

[h8kurdt]

There's 451 pages on this thread and you've gone through them to quote certain people.

Think about that.

[!@#$%!]

what are the board’s stable geniuses up to now? 69ing each other via quotation?

[h8kurdt]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

As we hit the final day of July, I thought this would be a good time to reflect on what has transpired. Just this week Attorney General William Barr testified before Congress that the Department of Justice has multiple investigations into spying and unmasking by the Obama Administration and wether this should lead to criminal charges.

It was the final week of July 2019 when Robbert Mueller testified before Congress proclaiming that he didn’t use the word —collusion— because it’s not a legal term!

Page 203 May 2018












And while some of you here didn’t understand that collusion wasn’t illegal, conspiracy is illegal and I have NO DOUBTS Attorney General Barr’s investigators will prove that Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton actively participated in the unmasking and spying against General Flynn and the Donald Trump campaign!


Page 304 February 2019



It’s important to remember that Hillary Clinton paid for the fake dossier and that information was used to perpetrate fraud upon the FISA court and of course that led to the Mueller investigation.


Page 366 July 2019















Take a look at the last quote: Former Federal Prosecutor on Mueller: 'He Clearly Did Not Run This Investigation'.”

Over two years and $30+ million dollars wasted because Barak Obama, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and the FBI wanted to fabricate a Trump-Russia narrative that many of the free minded freethinkers here at SYG swallowed hook line and sinker.

TALK ABOUT CONSPIRACY!!!

Someone tell Skuj to pull his head out of the sand and everyone pop some popcorn because this Wednesday, August 5th, Former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee and it’s going to be epic......everyone have a great weekend!!!

152,000 people dead, an economy that's being crippled and you're acting like Trump and his cronies are #winning.

Best bit is you honestly believe that Obama and gonna be jailed for this. As opposed the countless crimes Trump's administration have done Obama is a puppy dog.

[Bytor Peltor]

: )

[_tunic_]

Neil Young rewrites ‘Lookin’ for a Leader’

 

[h8kurdt]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

: )

Love this. Cos it's you basically ignoring every corrupt this Trump and his administration has ever done. Don't remember Obama getting fined $2 million for stealing from a fucking charity. That's just one thing in a BIG long list.


Sit down before you make yourself look silly. Oops, too late.

[The Soup Nazi]

You know, since we want Twitter and Facebook to stop being vehicles for lies, can't we take down Peltor's and Skunk's SYG accounts? They're spreading blatant horseshit, factually untrue bullcrap, not just moronic opinions.

Impeach 'em, remove 'em, make them drink a bleach cocktail and stick a red lightbulb up their rears.

[The Soup Nazi]

Originally Posted by Robert Schunk

Oooh! You didn't like the US imperialist-sponsored Pinochet regime with all its censorship, yet you call for censorship against us anti-US imperialist pro-Trump people!

If Pinochet were alive today, Trump would host a state dinner for him at the White House.

[Bytor Peltor]

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

You know, since we want Twitter and Facebook to stop being vehicles for lies, can't we take down Peltor's and Skunk's SYG accounts? They're spreading blatant horseshit, factually untrue bullcrap, not just moronic opinions.

This is what it looks like when someone can’t handle the TRUTH!!!

I’ve said it NUMEROUS times before and it still stands today, quote and replay any “factually untrue bull crap” and I’ll be happy to discuss it! And if proven to be actually false and not just your disagreed opinion, I’ll delete it!

[The Soup Nazi]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

I’ve said it NUMEROUS times before and it still stands today, quote and replay any “factually untrue bull crap” and I’ll be happy to discuss it! And if proven to be actually false and not just your disagreed opinion, I’ll delete it!

False. You mutants immediately discredit the source. Nevermind that you take your shit from Fox, The New York Post, Russian press (!), the goddamn Bible (sheezus) or seriously fucked-up conspiracy theories websites and tweets - Lawd forbid if we quote The Washington Post, The New York Times, CNN, The Guardian, or even The Economist and The Wall Street Journal (fuck me). And then comes false balance, false equivalence and argument to moderation from you - "you have your links, we have ours". That line of thinking is what got us in this putrid mess. One word, morons: accountability. When Obama was a presidential candidate, your sources said the end of civilization was coming. It didn't. But hey, you said "it was coming", so then with Hillary it was coming, now with Biden it is coming. You're the never-wrongers, accountable to no one - keep bringing on the lies, some of them gotta stick, and if the events are so big that they overwhelm them, nope, we never said 'em.

The media I usually quote (the "fake news" one, the "lamestream" one, so you dotards can understand what I'm referring to - even if I almost always include an extra link to all sources listed on Google News at a given moment) IS accountable. And it just has to be particularly accountable in this era, because since they're under attack by your Dear Leader 57 times a day, any factual mistake will result in handing your wannabe dictator a weapon of mass destruction against them. If they fuck up they have to own it, and they do by printing/posting a correction, even if it's about something basically superfluous to the story.

Having explained this (which is elemental stuff, really, I'm not discovering anything), back to your post above: you'll never "be happy to discuss", much less admit to be "proven actually false". You quote the BIBLE in what should be a serious back-and-forth for fuck's sakes. Talking to a Taliban asshole would be just as rewarding.

[Bytor Peltor]

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

False. You mutants immediately discredit the source. Nevermind that you take your shit from Fox, The New York Post, Russian press (!), the goddamn Bible (sheezus) or seriously fucked-up conspiracy theories websites and tweets - Lawd forbid if we quote The Washington Post, The New York Times, CNN, The Guardian, or even The Economist and The Wall Street Journal (fuck me). And then comes false balance, false equivalence and argument to moderation from you - "you have your links, we have ours". That line of thinking is what got us in this putrid mess. One word, morons: accountability. When Obama was a presidential candidate, your sources said the end of civilization was coming. It didn't. But hey, you said "it was coming", so then with Hillary it was coming, now with Biden it is coming. You're the never-wrongers, accountable to no one - keep bringing on the lies, some of them gotta stick, and if the events are so big that they overwhelm them, nope, we never said 'em.

The media I usually quote (the "fake news" one, the "lamestream" one, so you dotards can understand what I'm referring to - even if I almost always include an extra link to all sources listed on Google News at a given moment) IS accountable. And it just has to be particularly accountable in this era, because since they're under attack by your Dear Leader 57 times a day, any factual mistake will result in handing your wannabe dictator a weapon of mass destruction against them. If they fuck up they have to own it, and they do by printing/posting a correction, even if it's about something basically superfluous to the story.

Having explained this (which is elemental stuff, really, I'm not discovering anything), back to your post above: you'll never "be happy to discuss", much less admit to be "proven actually false". You quote the BIBLE in what should be a serious back-and-forth for fuck's sakes. Talking to a Taliban asshole would be just as rewarding.

When someone can’t handle the TRUTH, they resort to post such as this because they have nowhere else to go!

Just another EPIC FAIL from a member of SYG!!

[The Soup Nazi]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

Just another EPIC FAIL from a member of SYG!!

Then GO the FUCK AWAY.

Also, wanna add another exclamation mark to that? I think with one or two more you get a MAGA hat and a baloney sandwich.

[Bytor Peltor]

Originally Posted by Bytor Peltor

Just another EPIC FAIL from a member of SYG!!

Originally Posted by The Soup Nazi

Then GO the FUCK AWAY.

Also, wanna add another exclamation mark to that? I think with one or two more you get a MAGA hat and a baloney sandwich.

Speaking of EPIC FAILS......remember last page when Soup proclaimed he put me on ignore : )

It appears Soup deleted that post......that nazi can’t quit me!