[akprodr]

Originally Posted by floatingslowly

the faster you walk toward the spin of the galactic arm in regards to the fabric of space-time, the slower 'time' moves.

you know, i'd believe that more if it came from someone with a more space oriented name

[cagedbird]

Originally Posted by ploesj

my mother told me a lot of crap to explain stuff she didn't know about.

like, employment leads to friends

[Keeping It Simple]

In England when people think of UFO, they think of the band. They've been around since 1969 and released their 20th album last year!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmX-wJXMObs

[space]

we cum in pieces.

[Rob Instigator]

Originally Posted by akprodr

Not true. They did an experiment using clocks: one ground based and one on a commericial style jet (prob 707 or something). With very sensitive clocks, they could measure that time went slower for the jet or vise versa.

With an equally sensitive mass measuring device, they probably could have measured that too.

That is for time-dilation, not mass increase through relativistic speed acceleration.

[space]

ANY increase in energy causes mass increase. just because you can't measure it, doesn't mean it's not happening. as soon as you have two separate observers, you have relativistic speed....

E=MC2 (where C2 is a constant)...

o, laws, this thread is full of SCIETOMOLOGIZIFICATIONS.

[Rob Instigator]

by "relativistic" speeds I mean and scientists mean speeds close to the speed of light.

and I was referring to the high mass increase that makes it impossible to accelearet a massive object to light speed.


dig?


specifics robot. specifics.

[Rob Instigator]

and c is a constant in a vaccuum

[Pookie]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pgaw...layer_embedded

[pbradley]

"with even skeptical witnesses wondering if it was a UFO"

Unidentification fail.

[space]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

and c is a constant in a vaccuum

if E= MC2, and C2 = 1, then E+1=M(1)+1.

dig?

[Rob Instigator]

c2 equals the square root of funk

[tesla69]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

by "relativistic" speeds I mean and scientists mean speeds close to the speed of light..

of course it is important to state this is just theory and there's the idea that things might work differently outside the gravity well.

[Rob Instigator]

not "just"

a scientific theory is not the same as a hypothesis.

[akprodr]

Einstein made predictions about his 'theory' which, at current technology--circa -1910-20, where not possible to confirm. As technology progressed, tests were now possible and they have all confirmed this 'theory'.

My example of time on a relatively slow jet and gravity being able to bend light are two.

[Rob Instigator]

black holes were also "predicted" by relativity.
and those are everywhere

[tesla69]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

not "just"

a scientific theory is not the same as a hypothesis.

of course, and a scientific theory is not the same as scientific law

[akprodr]

Those are just names for the same thing. Murphy's Law and Einstein's theory are equally well proven.

[tesla69]

seashells on mars - this is fucking compelling, someone please show me this is a prank because I don't see it!

http://xenotechresearch.com/SpSol913.htm

[Rob Instigator]

Mars was shown recently to hav had a large liquid ocean hundreds of millions of years ago