[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ✌➬

"Funny you should bring this up; I'm getting fisted right now."- Savage Clone.

i was very tender with the clone!

no tears whatsoever.

[✌➬]

Anyways, I can't wait for Clinton/Obama '08. Suck it !@#$%!.

edit-I heard he complain you were to soft.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ✌➬

Anyways, I can't wait for Clinton/Obama '08. Suck it !@#$%!.

edit-I heard he complain you were to soft.

he said no such thing! we're extremely private.

anyway, hm, i think you meant obama/richardson

yeah!

so i was up very late tracking the latest polls. at this point, i'm spent, and i care no more.

gonna take an offline break for a while.

see you later.

[nature scene]

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator

obama should decriminalize marihuana as his first executive decree! that wopuld scare the bejeezus out of the GOP faithful!

Somehow, I don't see it happening:

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124882.html

NORML reports that Barack Obama, who was for marijuana decriminalization in 2004, against it last fall, and for it last week (when his campaign said he'd "always" been for it), is against it again:

A spokesman for Obama's campaign blamed confusion over the meaning of decriminalization for the inconsistencies, and said that while Obama does not support decriminalization, "we are sending far too many first-time, nonviolent drug users to prison for very long periods of time, and that we should rethink those laws."

It's true that decriminalization means different things to different people, but to equate it with opposition to mandatory minimum sentences distorts the concept beyond recognition. It's one thing to say decriminalization should be limited to simple possession of small quantities, or to say that it amounts to eliminating the possibility of arrest and jail, as opposed to repealing all penalties (i.e., the sort of "decriminalization" that has been adopted by 11 states). It's another to say that supporting decriminalization means thinking a crack dealer should serve one year instead of five. That certainly would be an improvement, and Obama should get credit for his willingness to go that far. But it defies belief to claim this was the sort of "decriminalization" he had in mind when he was running for the Senate and told students at Northwestern University "I think we need to...decriminalize our marijuana laws."

During the same appearance at Northwestern, Obama called the war on drugs "an utter failure" and said we need to "rethink" it, a position that makes him look decidedly better on this issue than Hillary Clinton. Assuming he still holds it.

sigh...

[ALIEN ANAL]

so who is winning at the moment

does it seem like a certain person is deff going to win or is it really close?

[✌➬]

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL

so who is winning at the moment

does it seem like a certain person is deff going to win or is it really close?

It is too close to call.

[ALIEN ANAL]

im excited for obama or clinton
i just want a president that will prob be assasinated

[pbradley]

young, black man versus an old, pro-war white man

[gmku]

Originally Posted by Cantankerous

well in any case, sorry for my cynicism, but
america is fucked.

Charles Manson will escape from prison. He will murder several minor movie stars and others in a Hollywood mansion. The race war will begin. In 3 years, we'll all be dead.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL

so who is winning at the moment

does it seem like a certain person is deff going to win or is it really close?

obama is ahead in delegates. hillary is unlikely to catch up. however, they will most likely lack the pledged delegates to win without superdelegate help.

the superdelegates are like-- you know what they are, right? they are like "party wisemen" who can vote for whoever they want.

[ALIEN ANAL]

no idea what this delegate and superman delegates and party wisemen shit is

[✌➬]

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL

no idea what this delegate and superman delegates and party wisemen shit is

You commoner.

[✌➬]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

anyway, hm, i think you meant obama/richardson

That is very unlikely to happen. Sorry to Burst your bubble. Richardson, is not well known, and he is a minority. I don't think this country is prepared to do two, minorities.

[!@#$%!]

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL

no idea what this delegate and superman delegates and party wisemen shit is

the delegates represent a portion of the electorate.

so when people vote in the primary, they are not electing a candidate directly. they are picking a delegate pledged to that candidate. the delegates then vote at the convention. in recent times the results have been decided in advance, but in previous times there was a lot of horse trading between the different delegates. fun stuff!

the superdelegates are these higher ups in the party (governors, congress people, etc) who vote directly at the convention. so their vote is worth the vote of thousands of people. while some argue they should go with the popular vote, the superdelegates can throw their support for whoever they prefer, for whatever reason they think.

there are 796 or so superdelegates out of the 4000 or so total delegates at the democratic convention--so about 20%

the republicans have different rules, and no superdelegates

oh you can read about superdelegates here

[ALIEN ANAL]

Originally Posted by ✌➬

You commoner.

fuck up

[ZEROpumpkins]

Originally Posted by !@#$%!

i was very tender with the clone!

no tears whatsoever.

Hahahahaha!

[m1rr0r dash]

Originally Posted by ✌➬

I don't think this country is prepared to do two, minorities.

?? - is prepared to do two minorities.

[ZEROpumpkins]

It's actually not two question marks. You musn't have the proper font on your computer.

[✌➬]

Who is ?? ?

[ZEROpumpkins]

You. If you don't have the font on your computer it shows up as two ?'s