king of limbs discussion

knox · 02.18.2011, 02:12 PM

first listen, sounds amazing already.

PAULYBEE2656 · 02.18.2011, 02:16 PM

got it just now..havent heard it..will listen later tonight..i will return with the paulybee 2 cents!

Decayed Rhapsody · 02.18.2011, 02:24 PM

I'm bored by it. I just think I'm bored by Radiohead in general, they have a sound that's kinda noticeable/distinctive, but I'm not into it.

Thom Yorke looks like a cock (rooster). He tries to be a funny spastic but he just looks like a grizzled cock.

noisereductions · 02.18.2011, 03:13 PM

it's already out? I thought Saturday?

DeadDiscoDildo · 02.18.2011, 03:31 PM

I've only heard two songs, little by little, and some other song where he's dancing like a dumbass, looking like A Clockwork Borange.

I didnt like the second one, but I actually really really liked "Little by Little".

The production is at least way better than In Rainbows.

knox · 02.18.2011, 03:40 PM

- Thom is hot, especially when dancing.
- 'Little by little' is one of the best, but it's hard to say, most tracks are really good.
- It was supposed to be tomorrow, but you know, it came out today. I bought the download on the website, and am waiting for my record to arrive.

deflinus · 02.18.2011, 04:40 PM

they're shipping the record earlier too. march 28th i think?

Separator is my favorite track.

Derek · 02.18.2011, 04:55 PM

It's boring.

atsonicpark · 02.18.2011, 05:26 PM

Wow, this is pretty boring so far. I mean -- what can I say? It's Radiohead. It sounds like them. This souns like stuff they could have recorded in their sleep. It's not "BAD", just uninspired.

And, perhaps, even worse, uninspiring.

hevusa · 02.18.2011, 05:26 PM

anyone know what text "the king of limbs" references?

downloading the album now

Derek · 02.18.2011, 05:36 PM

Sounds like a weak Thom Yorke solo record.

Torn Curtain · 02.18.2011, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hevusa

anyone know what text "the king of limbs" references?

I read somewhere it's taken from Inception (but I don't know if that's true).

EDIT: not true apparently (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_King_of_Limbs)

_slavo_ · 02.18.2011, 06:02 PM

it's shit. shit shit shit shit shit shit shit.

and that comes from a guy who, 13 years ago listened to nothing else than this band and at that time was seriously ready to punch anyone bad-mouthing them.

but this, this is plain shit.

Derek · 02.18.2011, 06:08 PM

slavo gets it right. High five!

_slavo_ · 02.18.2011, 06:18 PM

high five derek!

hevusa · 02.18.2011, 07:24 PM

I'm a big radiohead fan too but I'm not that impressed after my first listen. But sometimes it needs to grow on me. i'll listen to it again tomorrow.

SuperCreep · 02.18.2011, 07:42 PM

on first listen, this isn't bad (aside from "feral" which really is bad), just very uneventful. "lotus flower" and "codex" are the standouts for me, but neither strike me as anything more than "nice." i guess "little by little" is pretty good too.

i wanna say it's a grower, but i just don't hear any redeeming ideas for it to warrant that tag. i'll listen to it a few more times just to make sure, though.

SuperCreep · 02.18.2011, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derek

Sounds like a weak Thom Yorke solo record.

honestly, you could have slapped "the eraser - part II" on this and i wouldn't have been able to tell the difference.

washer · 02.18.2011, 08:01 PM

Well, I like it enough. Although this band has always striked me in a very personal way and the fact that "The King of Limbs" gives a not so impressive first impression, it shows the Radiohead side I prefer and a very pleasant (and to me, strangely "bright" for the band in question) mood, so it might become a grower... Even though I agree it doesn't seems to be, by no means, that great when compared with the best Radiohead output.

atsonicpark · 02.18.2011, 09:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _slavo_

it's shit. shit shit shit shit shit shit shit.

and that comes from a guy who, 13 years ago listened to nothing else than this band and at that time was seriously ready to punch anyone bad-mouthing them.

but this, this is plain shit.

Slavo wins.

This is the best post you've made in a while, wish I could rep you.

I'm going to go ahead and change my vote of it being "not bad" and have to agree.. it sucks. I honestly do think THE ERASER is a horrible record, absolutely bland in every way. And this record does resemble that one.

The songs are glossy and light. Radiohead sleepwalking. It's instant-songwriting studio shit, it's like Radiohead fucking with a shitty drum machine and layering obvious "Radiohead soundz" (TM) over top. It's boring as hell. Remember their INTERESTING electronic experiments on Kid A/Amnesiac? "Idiotheque" and so on? Fuck, those were badass. This shit is just bad. Bland as hell. Like, there's not even much songwirting on here. And the few "song" moments are just rehashes of shit Radiohead did better 11 years ago.

In Rainbows was boring but some of the riffing was okay. THis doesn't even have that, to my ears. IN RAINBOWS was probably the single most difficult alubm to listen to in one sitting, since it was so goddamned boring. This album might be worse.

02.18.2011, 02:12 PM	#1
knox invito al cielo Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,255	first listen, sounds amazing already. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 02:16 PM	#2
PAULYBEE2656 invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: wexford, rep of ireland Posts: 6,930	got it just now..havent heard it..will listen later tonight..i will return with the paulybee 2 cents! __________________ myspace facebook *twitter*
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 02:24 PM	#3
Decayed Rhapsody the destroyed room Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 572	I'm bored by it. I just think I'm bored by Radiohead in general, they have a sound that's kinda noticeable/distinctive, but I'm not into it. Thom Yorke looks like a cock (rooster). He tries to be a funny spastic but he just looks like a grizzled cock.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 03:13 PM	#4
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	it's already out? I thought Saturday? __________________ noisereduxinstalled.weebly.com
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 03:31 PM	#5
DeadDiscoDildo invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 3,805	I've only heard two songs, little by little, and some other song where he's dancing like a dumbass, looking like A Clockwork Borange. I didnt like the second one, but I actually really really liked "Little by Little". The production is at least way better than In Rainbows.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 03:40 PM	#6
knox invito al cielo Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 5,255	- Thom is hot, especially when dancing. - 'Little by little' is one of the best, but it's hard to say, most tracks are really good. - It was supposed to be tomorrow, but you know, it came out today. I bought the download on the website, and am waiting for my record to arrive. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 04:40 PM	#7
deflinus expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: in the darkest part of your mind Posts: 1,737	they're shipping the record earlier too. march 28th i think? Separator is my favorite track.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 04:55 PM	#8
Derek invito al cielo Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 8,095	It's boring.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 05:26 PM	#9
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Wow, this is pretty boring so far. I mean -- what can I say? It's Radiohead. It sounds like them. This souns like stuff they could have recorded in their sleep. It's not "BAD", just uninspired. And, perhaps, even worse, uninspiring. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 05:26 PM	#10
hevusa expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: rain hell Posts: 1,535	anyone know what text "the king of limbs" references? downloading the album now
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 05:36 PM	#11
Derek invito al cielo Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 8,095	Sounds like a weak Thom Yorke solo record.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 06:02 PM	#13
_slavo_ invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ðîññèÿ Posts: 10,907	it's shit. shit shit shit shit shit shit shit. and that comes from a guy who, 13 years ago listened to nothing else than this band and at that time was seriously ready to punch anyone bad-mouthing them. but this, this is plain shit. __________________ you're the boy that can enjoy invisibility
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 06:08 PM	#14
Derek invito al cielo Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 8,095	slavo gets it right. High five!
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 06:18 PM	#15
_slavo_ invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Ðîññèÿ Posts: 10,907	high five derek! __________________ you're the boy that can enjoy invisibility
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 07:24 PM	#16
hevusa expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: rain hell Posts: 1,535	I'm a big radiohead fan too but I'm not that impressed after my first listen. But sometimes it needs to grow on me. i'll listen to it again tomorrow.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 07:42 PM	#17
SuperCreep expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: brooklyn Posts: 2,281	on first listen, this isn't bad (aside from "feral" which really is bad), just very uneventful. "lotus flower" and "codex" are the standouts for me, but neither strike me as anything more than "nice." i guess "little by little" is pretty good too. i wanna say it's a grower, but i just don't hear any redeeming ideas for it to warrant that tag. i'll listen to it a few more times just to make sure, though. __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

02.18.2011, 08:01 PM	#19
washer bad moon rising Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Porto Posts: 210	Well, I like it enough. Although this band has always striked me in a very personal way and the fact that "The King of Limbs" gives a not so impressive first impression, it shows the Radiohead side I prefer and a very pleasant (and to me, strangely "bright" for the band in question) mood, so it might become a grower... Even though I agree it doesn't seems to be, by no means, that great when compared with the best Radiohead output.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|