HOLD THAT TIGER set

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 07:09 AM

Hadn't listened to HTT in a while. It's a really good set. But out of curiosity, why did they choose to play every song at marathon speed? Was it T aiming at hardcore, or speed induced intensity or what? I mean, they're playing like someone's chasing them with a butcher knife.

SonicBebs · 08.12.2008, 07:17 AM

sounds shit too. maybe that was the point?

nicfit · 08.12.2008, 07:17 AM

it's all faster to fit a cd.

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 07:42 AM

You';re saying they didn't play faster, they just sped the tape up?

atsonicpark · 08.12.2008, 07:46 AM

I always thought it was sped up a bit too.

(not them playing faster)

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 08:01 AM

whorefrost · 08.12.2008, 08:04 AM

yeh, I've heard it's a sped-up recording as well. It sounds fucking acecore whatever the truth of the matter

Toxa · 08.12.2008, 08:11 AM

punk rock

RanaldoNecro · 08.12.2008, 08:46 AM

its shit

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 10:00 AM

The vox dont sound chipmunky. But maybe it was sliiight.

atsonicpark · 08.12.2008, 10:05 AM

Vox only sound chipmunky if it's REALLY sped up.. actually, if the pitch is raised when being sped up.

If it was sped up, it was sped up like 1%

radarmaker · 08.12.2008, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nicfit

it's all faster to fit a cd.

The LP is the same speed.

scott v · 08.12.2008, 11:51 AM

the tape was sped up to fit the LP format, remember this is back in 1987 and the cd was pretty new then.

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 12:09 PM

But wasn't the CD supposedly remastered by Wharton in 97? (This is from memory... maybe I'm wrong?)

SonicBebs · 08.12.2008, 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noisereductions

But wasn't the CD supposedly remastered by Wharton in 97? (This is from memory... maybe I'm wrong?)

your right.

so i presummed it was released in 97

it doesn't sound fast to me anyway, just really far away

noisereductions · 08.12.2008, 04:37 PM

I think they were just playing fast. Seems like the mood (augmented by the 4 Ramones covers, which incidentally DON'T sound sped up-- like "Beat On The Brat" is played same speed as MASTERDIK version).

HECKLER SPRAY · 08.12.2008, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RanaldoNecro

its shit

No.
It's good.

Chris Lawrence · 08.12.2008, 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott v

the tape was sped up to fit the LP format, remember this is back in 1987 and the cd was pretty new then.

ding ding ding. it's only a fraction, but i think the Gs sound as G#s, or somewhere in that glorious semitone between.

08.12.2008, 07:09 AM	#1
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	Hadn't listened to HTT in a while. It's a really good set. But out of curiosity, why did they choose to play every song at marathon speed? Was it T aiming at hardcore, or speed induced intensity or what? I mean, they're playing like someone's chasing them with a butcher knife.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 07:17 AM	#2
SonicBebs expwy. to yr skull Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 1,680	sounds shit too. maybe that was the point?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 07:17 AM	#3
nicfit invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: banana boat Posts: 15,570	it's all faster to fit a cd. __________________ 11:11 11-11-11 I Ascended.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 07:42 AM	#4
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	You';re saying they didn't play faster, they just sped the tape up?
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 07:46 AM	#5
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	I always thought it was sped up a bit too. (not them playing faster) __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 08:01 AM	#6
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	hmm.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 08:04 AM	#7
whorefrost invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Arrived in Smoke, Arrived in Gold Posts: 2,569	yeh, I've heard it's a sped-up recording as well. It sounds fucking acecore whatever the truth of the matter __________________ hehehe
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 08:11 AM	#8
Toxa 100% Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Evil Empire Posts: 847	punk rock
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 08:46 AM	#9
RanaldoNecro expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Eye Of The Squirrel Posts: 1,481	its shit __________________ He is not Alone
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 10:00 AM	#10
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	The vox dont sound chipmunky. But maybe it was sliiight.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 10:05 AM	#11
atsonicpark invito al cielo Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 28,843	Vox only sound chipmunky if it's REALLY sped up.. actually, if the pitch is raised when being sped up. If it was sped up, it was sped up like 1% __________________
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 11:51 AM	#13
scott v expwy. to yr skull Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Buffalo, NY Posts: 1,484	the tape was sped up to fit the LP format, remember this is back in 1987 and the cd was pretty new then.
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 12:09 PM	#14
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	But wasn't the CD supposedly remastered by Wharton in 97? (This is from memory... maybe I'm wrong?)
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|

08.12.2008, 04:37 PM	#16
noisereductions invito al cielo Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: New England, USA Posts: 16,210	I think they were just playing fast. Seems like the mood (augmented by the 4 Ramones covers, which incidentally DON'T sound sped up-- like "Beat On The Brat" is played same speed as MASTERDIK version).
	\|QUOTE AND REPLY\|