Sonic Youth Gossip

Sonic Youth Gossip (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/index.php)
-   Non-Sonics (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   France releases ALL U.F.O. footage and paperwork! (http://www.sonicyouth.com/gossip/showthread.php?t=11583)

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 10:54 AM

France releases ALL U.F.O. footage and paperwork!
 
French get a look at nation's UFO files
Gov't releases 100,000 pages of testimony, photographs and film footage
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17753893/

http://www.cnes.fr/ they mentioned that the french website had mass overload of hits when they released the info. i tried and the page is down. sucks! try later!

Richard Pryor on Fire 03.23.2007 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
French get a look at nation's UFO files
Gov't releases 100,000 pages of testimony, photographs and film footage
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17753893/

http://www.cnes.fr/ they mentioned that the french website had mass overload of hits when they released the info. i tried and the page is down. sucks! try later!


That's fucking brilliant I hope more countries will follow suit and quit acting like some lil scared ass bitches. Server is still down.

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
French get a look at nation's UFO files
Gov't releases 100,000 pages of testimony, photographs and film footage
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17753893/

http://www.cnes.fr/ they mentioned that the french website had mass overload of hits when they released the info. i tried and the page is down. sucks! try later!


I've got an English version of that report on my laptop somewhere. It's interesting reading and all - but it comes largely to witness statements and debatable physical evidence, like scorch marks and depressions in the ground.

They haven't found a dead aliens body or a mashed up UFO on Mount Blanc or anything at all like that.

I'm pretty much from the Sagan camp of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". I believe there's life elsewhere in the universe, but I don't think there's nearly enough proof, in this report or elsewhere at this point, to firmly say that aliens are chilling out on earth.

Over the last year or so I've really tried to look at the evidence, and there are tantalising eyewitness reports from people that appear sane and rational. But I also know people are prone to being deeply fucked up, irrational, or just plain shit stirrers.

Everyone should know that a strange light in the sky isn't necessarily a UFO. Yet people consistently mistake venus for a flying saucer. People mistook a rocket burning up in the atmosphere for a UFO, they even said it had windows and the aliens were looking out.... that kind of leap scares me and it's things like that, which make me highly dubious of all eyewitness reports.

But, I do think the subject is worth looking into with an open and honest scientific study. If at the end of it, they find the evidence is still sorely lacking, then there's a good job for psychiatrists in trying to explain why certain people insist we're being "visited."

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 11:24 AM

a cool site for aliens and conspiracys is
www.abovetopsecret.com

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ithinkimissyou
I'm pretty much from the Sagan camp of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". I believe there's life elsewhere in the universe, but I don't think there's nearly enough proof, in this report or elsewhere at this point, to firmly say that aliens are chilling out on earth.


well put.

humans have always been egocentric. we want to believe that someone/something would even bother coming from halfway across the universe to visit us.

I think the Nazca Lines of Peru offer more reasonable evidence for visitation than anything I've see or heard in the last 30 years.

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 11:31 AM

did you catch my post on the size of other stars and shit in this universe. Its so amazing, and it got me thinking, correct me if im wrong....but if there is suns a zillion times bigger than our suns and so on..does that mean there could be planets a zillion times smaller than us with life on it?

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 11:37 AM

I'm not sure about a zillion times bigger but lots of stars have more mass than our sun does. we've got a medium-small yellow.....which is good news if yr worried about core collapse at some point. :)

thanks to the redefinition of "planet", I'm not sure that a body much smaller than Mercury would qualify as one any longer.

I firmly believe that life is like a virus and spreads from "planet" to "planet" via ejection material. adaptation depends on the environment, and I'm sure that SOMEWHERE there is a colony of super-small Astral-Sea Monkies plotting universal domination.

that being said....I think there's still a very good chance that life exists in the polar caps of Mars. there's also a decent chance that there is something under the ice of Europa (points to avatar). granted...."life" doesn't mean that it's likely more than single-cell organisms.

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
did you catch my post on the size of other stars and shit in this universe. Its so amazing, and it got me thinking, correct me if im wrong....but if there is suns a zillion times bigger than our suns and so on..does that mean there could be planets a zillion times smaller than us with life on it?


Giant stars have short lives from what I understand. This means their planets have a short time to form and develop any sort of atmosphere worth talking about. That's not even discussing the posibility of life.

So I don't think they'd be ideal candidates.

Tiny stars, dead stars, dwarfs.. whatever they're called. I don't know much about their planetary systems, but I'm guessing the lack of light & the fact that any close planet probably got fried before the star shrunk (stars like our sun grow massively before they die) wouldn't help life either.

The Alpha Centauri system is a really interesting place, at least one of the Stars is much like our own and it's relatively close by - a few light years. If there are planets in orbit, there could be one like ours.

But the big variable is, we only know about evolution on one planet, our own. It's possible that life could evolve which is extremely different from us in every way. I'd love to think that life, any kind, be it microbe or plant will be discovered off earth in my lifetime. Europa, the high latitudes of mars and Titan have to be studied in even greater depth than they have been already.

Personally I think one of the most interesting discoveries made since we went into space was on one of the Apollo missions. They took back an instrument from a robotic lander that got there before them. When the instrument was analysed, they discovered traces of bacteria/virus (some flu variant I think). It got in before the lander was launched when somebody sneezed.

Turns out the organism was able to adapt quickly, and went into a kind of slumber while on the surface of the moon. If a lifeform from this planet is able to adapt so quickly to such an alien world, it says much for the possibility of life throughout the universe. In my opinion anyway.

Sorry for going on at length, I'm a bit of a space dork. The cosmos just fascinates me to a rediculous degree. I enjoy thinking about it... daydreaming.

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 11:48 AM

the attribution of ancient people's artistic achievements to "aliens" is an insult to their capabilities and intelligence. The Nazca lines of peru and the piramids of ancient egypt are always taken to be too great for their creators to have made. That is prejudice.

the nazca lines are visible from tethered hot air balloons. There is evidence that the culture that made them had knowledge of primitive ballooning.


I personally think that it is far more likely that we are being visited by humans from the far future than from an alien life from some other planet.

The era of radio/energy communication in the Earth is under 100 years old. That means that, at optimum conditions, any "signals" that we have sent out that may be intercepted by some alien life, woudl have only travelled about 100 light years in all directions. That is not very far considering estimates of over 150 thousand light years as the diameter of our galaxy.


One thing. The "brightest" object in our solar system is not the sun, but the earth. the earth shines forth in every possible energy spectrum much brighter than the sun, due to our television, radar, radio, microwave sattelite, etc etc etc. If a pasing ship were to train a radio telescope at our solar system they would see what looked like two stars.
This has been suggested a sa way for us to find intelligent life, if we can find extra solar planets that shine as bright as earth does, then we would KNOW that there must be intelligent life creating such a massive energy release.

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 11:49 AM

well the idea came from the video i posted in HUGE BALLS thread.
It is said that earth is invisible when your looking at the size of VVceiphe(sp?)
so it got me thinking..what if we are a huge planet compared to this tiny weeny planet..but it isnt really tiny weeny..we are just huge..
I dont know the deep science of how it all works..so forgive me if i come off as an idiot :)

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 11:53 AM

well, alien anal, isaac asimov once stated that, since the earth has at least a 4.5 BILLION year hiostory, that the odds that we were visited by alien life in the 4.5 billion years before humanity came around (we have been aroundsomewhere between 1 million and 500 thousand years) are astronomically larger than to have been visited in the past 200 years.\

also, he stated there is no way to know that aliens are not crawling all ove rus at any second, because they could just as easily be microscopic to us, or macroscopic, too large for us to notice they are aliens.

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 11:55 AM

neato. watch this if you havnt already. It svery impressive

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...66981713172831

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
well the idea came from the video i posted in HUGE BALLS thread.
It is said that earth is invisible when your looking at the size of VVceiphe(sp?)
so it got me thinking..what if we are a huge planet compared to this tiny weeny planet..but it isnt really tiny weeny..we are just huge..
I dont know the deep science of how it all works..so forgive me if i come off as an idiot :)


You're not coming across as an idiot, you're just speculating about the possibility of something, that's how all good idea's start off :)

I don't know enough about the subject to talk about the likelyhood of it though. But anyone who's seen an illustration of the structure of an atom, and knows what the solar system looks like can see certain similarities...

We could just be one dimension.

There's so much we don't know.

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 11:59 AM

i once read this cool page on dimensions, and it used illustrations of a triangle man and his world living in 2D and how it would look if a 3d man stuck a pin into his 2D world..then it went on to say ask what would it look like if a 4D man stuck a pin in our 3D world

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
i once read this cool page on dimensions, and it used illustrations of a triangle man and his world living in 2D and how it would look if a 3d man stuck a pin into his 2D world..then it went on to say ask what would it look like if a 4D man stuck a pin in our 3D world


Yeah I've watched demonstrations of that too...

I actually can't get my head around it to be honest. Can I use the term "complete mindfuck" to describe it. Ok it was a complete mindfuck. I'm just glad I wasnt high at the time or I would have had an anyeurism.

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 12:09 PM

haha yeh, i wanna be high. should be getting a bag tomorrow Woo
anyway
Its pretty annoying we wont see much of future space travel in our life time.

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
Its pretty annoying we wont see much of future space travel in our life time.


isn't that truth.

it's already waaaay past 2001 and we still haven't found a giant obelisk on the moon.

WHERE IS THE FUCKING FUTURE I WAS PROMISED BY ARTHUR C CLARKE?? :mad:

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 12:14 PM

i wish who ever it is would let the raileins build their temple thing, so they might be crazy mofos..but if they arnt then we have aliens waiting at our doorstep!

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
Its pretty annoying we wont see much of future space travel in our life time.


I agree somewhat, but it would have been far worse living 500 years back with no telescopes and the church burning you if you said the earth wasn't at the centre of the universe.

Also, we might wind up blowing ourselves to smithereans before we can achieve interstellar travel. Thats why, even as a kid I reckoned any "aliens" which might happen upon our little world would be decent folk. Because to get here they would have had to co-operate in the use of massive power sources instead of blowing each other up with it, the latter of which seems to be a bit of human trait unfortunately.

Hopefully we'll change.

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALIEN ANAL
they might be crazy mofos..


I endorse alien_sex_cults of any kind!

personally, I'm waiting for Quetzalcoatl's return 12/21/12. the Mayans might have been heart-eating savages, but they sure knew a lot about the sky and their universe.

although, I'm going to be really pissed off if Quetz turns out to be Jeezus instead of a googly-eyed spacemonster. :eek:

ALIEN ANAL 03.23.2007 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floatingslowly
I endorse alien_sex_cults of any kind!


look who your talking to:p

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 12:53 PM

my bad.

I endorse alien_vaginal_sex_cults.

fixed! :)

!@#$%! 03.23.2007 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floatingslowly
I endorse alien_sex_cults of any kind!

personally, I'm waiting for Quetzalcoatl's return 12/21/12. the Mayans might have been heart-eating savages, but they sure knew a lot about the sky and their universe.

although, I'm going to be really pissed off if Quetz turns out to be Jeezus instead of a googly-eyed spacemonster. :eek:


hey hey-- heart-eating maybe, but more savage than nuking hiroshima? now, now...

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by !@#$%!
hey hey-- heart-eating maybe, but more savage than nuking hiroshima? now, now...


oh, I wasn't making a comparison.:D

and yes, I would much rather devour the still-beating hearts of a 1000 virgins than tac-nuke some sleepy villagers.

mmmmm....virgins.

tesla69 03.23.2007 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floatingslowly
I endorse alien_sex_cults of any kind!


I hear that, I just wish there were more alien sex cult women seducing me with insane-chick sex to get me to join their cult.

I seriously doubt if there is any valid contact material in the French docs that is will be released, or was ever even included in the archive.

Personally, I think our conception of space and time is limited due to our consciousness being limited by the 3rd dimension. Sometimes we get a glimpse into the 4th dimension...I mean the 'passing' of time is an illusion, everything that has or will happen is kind spread out and our 3rd dimensional perception only allows us to see one moment at a time - if we had 4th dimensional consciousness we would see a persons' entire life as a kind of streak - if you were to look that closely - I also think our language limits our abilities of mind.

Phil Dick used to talked about indigenous super intelligent lifeforms that evolved beyond our perception for survival, like a leopard evolved with spots as camoflauge. William Burroughs said we'd have to re=engineer our bodies to get into space, right now we're like fish in a bowl. Brion Gysin asserted we are HERE TO GO!

A concept I find compelling is that consciousness evolved before 'life' in the tremendous galactic clouds of the universe that after billions of years congealed into the universe...

ok thats enough coffee for Jim today thanks..

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 01:50 PM

dimensions is crazy.

stephen Hawking, one mof my physics heroes (I have many) won the Nobel prize in physics for work he did on black holes. teen tiny miniscule areas of space behave in very very strange ways once you get past a certain tinyness (Planck distance.) The same holds true for time. once you get below Planck Time (something like 1 billionth of a second or so) the universe takes on strange characteristics.
for the longest, after einsteins equations predicted what we now call black holes (something with a gravity so massive that nothing can escape the gravuitational pull, even light/energy), there was a large argument as to whether black holes were detectable. To be detectable some form of information must leave the black hole, either radiation or particles or something, and most people believed that was impossible.

Hawking, while his wife was getting him dressed for bed, thought about this. Quantum physics states that, below planck size, even the most empty vacuum of deep space is actually a froth of virtual particles and their anti particles popping in and out of existance, annhihilating each other before the planck time has elapsed, thereby noever affecting the overall entropy of the universe, and being undetectable to us. Hawking thought about this, and reasoned, that if along a black hole's event horizon, a particle and it's anti particle popped into existance, and one of the two was sucked into the balck hole, the other would NOT pop out of existance, and would instead be shot out from the black hole's event horizon. seeing as how in even a cubic centimeter of space there are trillion sof virtual particles popping up and down, odds are quite a few would be split up by a black hole's ebvent horizon. he then proceeded to do the calqulations for a typical black hole,a dn arrived at a certain number, very very low, of radiation coming from a black hole's edge due to this phenomenom that he "discovered" while getting ready for bed.

sure enough, radio telescopes were trained on areas thought to be black holes, and the very very low radiation was found, totally consistent with hawking's estimates!!!!!


crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tesla69
I just wish there were more alien sex cult women seducing me with insane-chick sex to get me to join their cult.


if only it worked the other way around, I'd be next "extraterrestrial" Jim Jones for sure!

Heaven's Gate had it all wrong. besides purple Nikes being a gawd-awful cosmic fashion statement, the first rule about Alien Sex Cult is you DO NOT mutilate each other's genitalia into nonexistance. what a waste. :cool:

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
sure enough, radio telescopes were trained on areas thought to be black holes, and the very very low radiation was found, totally consistent with hawking's estimates!!!!!


I think that the jury is still out on Hawking Radiation.

it's gone from photons skimming the edge of the event horizon to be sling-shot back into space, to thermodynamic conversion of a portion of the energy consumed to maintain equilibrium (the energy is converted to x-rays). some black holes do emit x-ray jets from their poles, however the bulk of them are only detectable by red-shift analysis of superoccluding bodies.

I love me some black holes! <3

in fact, my current theory on the Big Bang is that it was a "white hole". I think that given a long amount of time, a black hole can consume enough to reach a critical mass where the combined gravity of it's meals rip space/time (although only momentarily). this temporary wormhole would funnel particles across the dimensional barrier which then explosively expand upon reaching "free space". extra-dimensional diarrhea for the win!

yes, I want to be a mad scientist when I grow up.

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 02:31 PM

physics rules!

atari 2600 03.23.2007 02:44 PM

yeah, the physics branch does rule
and science rules too

If you have a knowledge of physics, then you know there are no alien spacecraft visiting Earth.

I assure you that any unidentified flying objects are quite terrestrial in origin.

I'll leave it at that.

Rob Instigator 03.23.2007 02:50 PM

remember all those triangular UFO's seen in the 70's? and they all turned out to be test flights of the stealth Bomber?

hilarious!

aliens schmeliens.

floatingslowly 03.23.2007 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by atari 2600
If you have a knowledge of physics, then you know there are no alien spacecraft visiting Earth.


then how do you explain THIS:
 

bikes can't fly themselves!

Brett Robinson 03.23.2007 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob Instigator
remember all those triangular UFO's seen in the 70's? and they all turned out to be test flights of the stealth Bomber?

hilarious!

aliens schmeliens.




Sure, the ones from the 70's, maybe, but what about the ones seen pre-1940s, or the ones seen in Phoenix ten years ago this month (and other times in Phoenix). The former governor came out recently to state that the object was still unidentified, despite his condescending press conference in March of 1997 ridiculing people who claimed it was a mysterious craft.

Sure, UFOs may be terrestrial in origin, but if so, there's a lot of black science going on that all you fans of physics and science should be pissed off that it's still "above top secret."

science (or rather, much of the funding received by scientific institutes) is so political as to be near worthless.

ithinkimissyou 03.23.2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by floatingslowly
then how do you explain THIS:

 

bikes can't fly themselves!


that's patently a swamp gas emission, the "bike" is a fly on the camera lens.

next

tesla69 03.23.2007 03:59 PM

yeah all the good stuff is top secret - and I believe one of the purposes of all the govt spying is so they can steal ideas from independent researchers...

of course antigravity research is so dangerous it probably should be banned, period...so those researchers probably should be monitored.

the world is an egg. no one knows what will hatch.

Brett Robinson 03.26.2007 11:08 AM

I'd say the government is more likely to indirectly fund research than steal ideas. That'd be a lot easier. Of course, due to the whole "compartmentalization" aspect of intelligence, I wouldn't be surprised at how disorganized the whole thing is.

Which is a shame really, that no one knows what's really going on. I watched a lecture with former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer who described the situation as "trying to read an encyclopedia to a 9 year old." I think that's a pretty accurate description of the entire UFO phenomenon. I mean, you can read all the books and watch all the videos you want, but that's not science. And I'm sure the BEST research hasn't ever been published, for fear of ridicule.

Sad state of affairs!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content ©2006 Sonic Youth