10.09.2009, 03:51 AM | #1 |
stalker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 389
|
In australia we have two competing current affair shows. both constantly outdo each other with biased stories, obvious product placement and digs at rival television stations and their shows. countless times these shows have been caught out for fabricating their "stories" and making up statistics to support them. we do have a couple of unbiased current affair shows on some of the lower rating channels, but these attract nowhere near the viewing that a current affair and today tonight do.
so i ask you, are the current affair shows in your country this crap? |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 04:01 AM | #2 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SoKo
Posts: 10,621
|
Australia is fucked up.
I'd say The Daily Show but I am aware of my own liberal bias (i.e. young liberals that are defining more than half of US politics today). I think American competition is suspended more between whole channels with their liberal bias versus Fox News' conservative bias. No American is aware of current affairs without digestion. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 04:13 AM | #3 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 12,282
|
no, current affairs TV in the UK is pretty good, much better than our print media
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 05:15 AM | #4 | |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,664
|
I think the UK might be ok relative to the states or Australia, but I feel like TV media is pathologically negative; while it's good to have a media that can, and do, openly criticise the government and the opposition, I think the recent MP's funding scandal has meant the media is the government's bully, regardless of the people's wishes. Paxman is capable of being a genuinely insightful interviewer, but he's also capable of being a hectoring do-nothing.
__________________
Message boards are the last vestige of the spent masturbator, still intent on wasting time in some neg-heroic fashion. Be damned all who sail here. Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 06:36 AM | #5 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: the future where it's hot and dark
Posts: 5,926
|
The editing jobs are the best/worst part of them. I wish I could think of an example of how shitful they are but I rarely sit down to watch any of them.
Think high school media class. The 'lower rating channels' are unbiased because they aren't allowed to be. Well, the ABC probably sits a bit further to the left of centre, but SBS to me is smack bang in the middle.
__________________
tiny and lost. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 06:39 AM | #6 |
invito al cielo
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: the future where it's hot and dark
Posts: 5,926
|
__________________
tiny and lost. |
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 06:42 AM | #7 | |
stalker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 389
|
Quote:
|
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.09.2009, 01:11 PM | #8 | |
100%
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 725
|
Quote:
You only have to look at the ABCs debate program: moderated by Tony Jones (favours Coalition), one member from Labor & one member from Coalition (factions of the Business Party), someone from a conservative think tank or industry group, one of Murdochs scenthounds, and some blowhard media personality ("the left").
__________________
This is how it will all end: not with floods, earthquakes, falling comets or gigantic crabs roaming the Earth. No, doomsday will start simply out of indifference. |
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.10.2009, 12:32 AM | #9 |
stalker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 389
|
that doesn't account for the entire ABC though, just the journalists.
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |
10.10.2009, 06:18 AM | #10 |
stalker
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rigid Kuntaurus
Posts: 475
|
ABC journalists traditionally favour the left. Always have and probably always will.
__________________
|
|QUOTE AND REPLY| |